Opportunities and Challenges of Carbon Footprint, Climate or CO2 Labelling for Horticultural Products [Chancen und Herausforderungen der Carbon Footprint, Klima oder CO2 Kennzeichnung von gartenbaulichen Produkten]

被引:0
作者
Schaefer F. [1 ]
Blanke M. [1 ]
机构
[1] INRES -Gartenbauwissenschaft, Universität Bonn, Auf dem Hügel 6
来源
Erwerbs-Obstbau | 2014年 / 56卷 / 2期
关键词
Biodiversity; Carbon footprint; Climate label; Communication; Greenhouse gases (GHG); PAS2050-1; Resource conservation; Sustainability;
D O I
10.1007/s10341-014-0206-6
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The number of fruits on the German and European markets with a carbon label is on the increase. This contribution reviews the existing carbon labels by evaluating, categorising and giving background information to provide guidance for labelling home-grown horticultural produce. The existing labels worldwide were classified in 10 categories: (1) CO2 value; (2) Colour code (with or without CO2 value); (3) CO2 reduction (Carbon Trust, Tesco's, UK) or conversion labels; (4) Climatop for Migros, Switzerland (temporal label for the best product within a product category, e.g., banana, rice, salt); (5) Airfreight labels, e.g., Marks & Spencer's UK (without further information); (6) 'Climate, carbon offset or CO2-neutral', e.g., NewTree, (only when using gold standard CO2 emission certificates); (7) unaccounted CO2 compensation measures (such as planting young trees: 'CO2 pineapple' in Costa Rica); (8) Sustainability labels (ProPlanet, REWE), (9) sustainability reports (printed or online) and (10) QR-Code on the shelf or product to access web-based information. The 'Pros and Cons' of the climate labels are compared with respect to the seasonal fruit and vegetables often sold on the markets as lose items and the stakeholder interest. Labelling approaches 4, 8, 9 and 10 appeared suitable for seasonal fruits and vegetables based on criteria such as transparency, clarity, objectivity and integration in the sustainability context. Overall, it is difficult to use labels with a CO2 value for horticultural products, because (a) the consumer may find it difficult to judge and memorise numeric values, particularly if expressed on different units (e.g. packet size, 1 l, 100 g) and (b) because of the big variation between the farm production systems and the variability between the year to year weather and (c) the consumer may find shopping with a seasonal crop calendar and country of origin label a better choice. © 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
引用
收藏
页码:73 / 80
页数:7
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
Blanke, M., Von weit her eingeflogen? (2009) Rheinische Monatsschrift, 97 (1), p. 16
[2]  
Blanke, M., Der klimafreundliche Apfel von nebenan (2012) InnoFrutta, 1, pp. 1-6
[3]  
Blanke, M., Burdick, B., Food (miles) for thought: energy balance for locally-grown versus imported apple from New Zealand (2005) Environ Sci Pollut Res, 12 (3), pp. 125-127
[4]  
Blanke, M., Burdick, B., Energiebilanzen für Obstimporte: Äpfel aus Deutschland oder Übersee? (2005) Erwerbs-Obstbau, 47 (6), pp. 135-137
[5]  
Blomqvist, O., (2009) Different types of climate labels for food products, , Master thesis, Lunds Universitet, Sweden
[6]  
Boardman, B., Carbon labelling: too complex or will it transform our buying? (2008) Signif, 5 (4), pp. 168-171
[7]  
PAS2060- Carbon neutrality (2010) Specifications for the demonstration of carbon neutrality, , BSI, British Standards Institution BSI, London-Chiswick, UK
[8]  
PAS2050: October 2008 (2011) Specification for the assessment of life cycle green house gas emissions of goods and services, , BSI, British Standards Institute BSI, London-Chiswick, UK
[9]  
Denstedt, C., Breloh, L., Lüneburg-Wolthaus, L., Blanke, M.M., Carbon footprint of early imported strawberries from Huelva into Germany- from farm to fork (2010) Proceedings of the LCA foods congress, 1, p. 499. , In: Notamicola B et al (eds), (Notamicola, B., et al., eds.), Universita degli Studi di Bari Aldo Moro, 22-24 September 2012, Italy, 22-24 September 2012
[10]  
Eberle, U., (2010) Studie im Auftrag der Verbraucherzentralen zum CO2 Fußabdruck- Vergleich der label, , http://www.verbraucherzentralen.de