Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: Outcomes reported by a centre with no previous laparoscopic experience

被引:0
作者
Giberti C. [1 ]
Gallo F. [1 ]
Schenone M. [1 ]
Cortese P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, San Paolo Hospital, Savona 17100, Via Genova
关键词
Laparoscopy; Pyeloplasty; Robotics; Ureteral obstruction;
D O I
10.1007/s11701-009-0145-7
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LP) has proved to be an effective minimally invasive treatment for ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO). However, its application is still limited by the challenge of the laparoscopic learning curve, which seems to be overcome by the recent introduction of robot assistance. The aim of this manuscript is to show our outcomes after the first robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasties (RP) and critically evaluate the feasibility of this technique when performed by a surgical team without any previous laparoscopic experience. Between March 2005 and July 2008, 16 patients with UPJO underwent transperitoneal RPs. Before and after surgery patients were evaluated by ultrasonography, intravenous urography or retrograde pyelography, computed tomography (CT) scan, and/or diuretic renography. Mean follow-up was 16.8 months. The assessed outcomes were mean operative time (OT), mean estimated blood loss (EBL), mean length of hospital stay (LOS), success (SR), and complication rates (CR). OT, EBL, LOS, and SR were 202 min, 60 ml, 5.2 days, and 94%, respectively. Among the minor complications, two patients (12%) reported moderate abdominal pain while, concerning major complications, one patient (6%) developed ileus. Robot assistance was confirmed as a special tool for laparoscopic treatment of UPJO with excellent outcomes after a shorter learning curve. As shown by our results, the feasibility of RP may also be extended to naïve surgeons who can approach this technique even in the absence of previous laparoscopic training, rapidly attaining results similar to those reported by both laparoscopically experienced and expert robotic surgeons. © 2009 Springer-Verlag London Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:83 / 87
页数:4
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Rassweiler J.J., Subotic S., Feist-Schwenk M., Sugiono M., Schulze M., Teber D., Et al., Minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: Long term experience with an algorithm for laser endopyelotomy and laparoscopic retroperitoneal pyeloplasty, J Urol, 177, pp. 1000-1005, (2007)
  • [2] Stein R.J., Gill I.S., Desai M.M., Comparison of surgical approaches to ureteropelvic junction obstruction: Endopyeloplasty versus endopyelotomy versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty, Current Urology Reports, 8, 2, pp. 140-149, (2007)
  • [3] Brooks J.D., Kavoussi L.R., Preminger G.M., Schuessler W.W., Moore R.G., Comparison of open and endourological approaches to the obstructed ureteropelvic junction, Urology, 46, pp. 791-795, (1995)
  • [4] Klingler H.C., Remzi M., Janetschek G., Kratzik C., Marberger M.J., Comparison of open versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty techniques in treatment of uretero-pelvic junction obstruction, Eur Urol, 44, pp. 340-345, (2003)
  • [5] Inagaki T., Rha K.H., Ong A.M., Kavoussi L.R., Jarrett T.W., Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: Current status, BJU International, Supplement, 95, 2, pp. 102-105, (2005)
  • [6] Jarrett T.W., Chan D.Y., Charambura T.C., Fugita O., Kavoussi L.R., Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: The first 100 cases, Journal of Urology, 167, 3, pp. 1253-1256, (2002)
  • [7] Vijayanand D., Hasan T., Rix D., Soomro N., Laparoscopic transperitoneal dismembered pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction, Journal of Endourology, 20, 12, pp. 1050-1053, (2006)
  • [8] Patel V.R., Chammas Jr M.F., Shah S., Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: A review of minimally invasive treatment options for ureteroplevic junction obstruction, J Robot Surg, 1, pp. 247-252, (2008)
  • [9] Tekgul S., Riedmiller E., Gerharz P., Paediatric urology, European Association of Urology Guidelines, 2008 Edn., pp. 6-78, (2008)
  • [10] Moon D.A., El-Shazly M.A., Chang C.M., Gianduzzo T.R., Eden C.G., Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: Evolution of a new gold standard, Urology, 67, pp. 932-936, (2006)