New automated Markov–Gibbs random field based framework for myocardial wall viability quantification on agent enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance images

被引:0
作者
Ahmed Elnakib
Garth M. Beache
Georgy Gimel’farb
Ayman El-Baz
机构
[1] University of Louisville,BioImaging Laboratory, Department of Bioengineering
[2] University of Louisville,Department of Diagnostic Radiology, School of Medicine
[3] University of Auckland,Department of Computer Science
来源
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging | 2012年 / 28卷
关键词
Myocardial viability; Gadolinium; Segmentation; Contrast enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance images; Markov–Gibbs random field; Ischemic heart disease;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
A novel automated framework for detecting and quantifying viability from agent enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance images is proposed. The framework identifies the pathological tissues based on a joint Markov–Gibbs random field (MGRF) model that accounts for the 1st-order visual appearance of the myocardial wall (in terms of the pixel-wise intensities) and the 2nd-order spatial interactions between pixels. The pathological tissue is quantified based on two metrics: the percentage area in each segment with respect to the total area of the segment, and the trans-wall extent of the pathological tissue. This transmural extent is estimated using point-to-point correspondences based on a Laplace partial differential equation. Transmural extent was validated using a simulated phantom. We tested the proposed framework on 14 datasets (168 images) and validated against manual expert delineation of the pathological tissue by two observers. Mean Dice similarity coefficients (DSC) of 0.90 and 0.88 were obtained for the observers, approaching the ideal value, 1. The Bland–Altman statistic of infarct volumes estimated by manual versus the MGRF estimation revealed little bias difference, and most values fell within the 95% confidence interval, suggesting very good agreement. Using the DSC measure we documented statistically significant superior segmentation performance for our MGRF method versus established intensity-based methods (greater DSC, and smaller standard deviation). Our Laplace method showed good operating characteristics across the full range of extent of transmural infarct, outperforming conventional methods. Phantom validation and experiments on patient data confirmed the robustness and accuracy of the proposed framework.
引用
收藏
页码:1683 / 1698
页数:15
相关论文
共 191 条
[1]  
Kühl HP(2003)Myocardial viability in chronic ischemic heart disease: comparison of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging with (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography J Am Coll Cardiol 41 1341-1348
[2]  
Beek AM(1998)Contrast enhanced and functional magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of viable myocardium after infarction Am Heart J 135 875-880
[3]  
van der Weerdt AP(2002)Assessment of myocardial viability with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with positron emission tomography Circulation 105 162-167
[4]  
Hofman MB(2002)Accuracy of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in predicting improvement of regional myocardial function in patients after acute myocardial infarction Circulation 106 1083-1089
[5]  
Visser CA(2003)Delayed contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for the prediction of regional functional improvement after acute myocardial infarction J Am Coll Cardiol 42 895-901
[6]  
Lammertsma AA(2008)Late contrast enhancement by CMR: more than scar? Int J Cardiovasc Imag 24 609-611
[7]  
Heussen N(1999)Relationship of MRI delayed contrast enhancement to irreversible injury, infarct age, and contractile function Circulation 100 1992-2002
[8]  
Visser FC(2000)Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of myocardium at risk: distinction between reversible and irreversible injury throughout infarct healing J Am Coll Cardiol 36 1985-1991
[9]  
van Rossum AC(2003)Quantitative assessment of myocardial scar in delayed enhancement magnetic resonance imaging J Magn Reson Imag 18 434-441
[10]  
Dendale P(2004)Accurate and objective infarct sizing by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in a canine myocardial infarction model J Am Coll Cardiol 44 2383-2389