Exchanging knowledge to improve organic arable farming: an evaluation of knowledge exchange tools with farmer groups across Europe

被引:2
作者
Bliss K. [1 ]
Padel S. [1 ]
Cullen B. [2 ]
Ducottet C. [3 ]
Mullender S. [1 ]
Rasmussen I.A. [4 ]
Moeskops B. [5 ]
机构
[1] Organic Research Centre, Elm Farm, Hamstead Marshall, Newbury, Berkshire
[2] Westminster University, London
[3] INRA, Paris
[4] ICROFS, Aarhus University, Tjele
[5] IFOAM-EU, Brussels
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Internet; Knowledge exchange; Organic arable farming; Peer-to-peer; Technical guide; Video;
D O I
10.1007/s13165-018-0238-6
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Organic farming is knowledge intensive. To support farmers in improving yields and organic agriculture systems, there is a need to improve how knowledge is shared. There is an established culture of sharing ideas, successes and failures in farming. The internet and information technologies open-up new opportunities for knowledge exchange involving farmers, researchers, advisors and other practitioners. The OK-Net Arable brought together practitioners from regional Farmer Innovation Groups across Europe in a multi-actor project to explore how online knowledge exchange could be improved. Feedback from the groups was obtained for 35 ‘tools’, defined as end-user materials, such as technical guides, videos and websites informing about practices in organic agriculture. The groups also selected one practice to test on farms, sharing their experiences with others through workshops, exchange visits and through videos. Farmers valued the same key elements in face-to-face exchanges (workshops and visits) as in online materials. These were the opportunity for visual observation, deeper understanding of the context in which a practice was being tried and details about what worked and what did not work. Videos, decision support tools and social media can provide useful mechanisms for taking knowledge exchange online, enabling farmers and researchers to share experiences and practical implications. Visual information, economics, details of the context, successes and failures were considered to be critical factors in good knowledge exchange tools. Online platforms and forums should not be expected to replace but rather to complement face to face knowledge exchange in improving organic farming. © 2018, Springer Nature B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:383 / 398
页数:15
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
Almekinders C.J.M., The joint development of JM-12.7: a technographic description of the making of a bean variety, Neth J Agric Sci, 57, 3-4, pp. 207-216, (2011)
[2]  
Arbenz M., Gould D., Stopes C., ORGANIC 3.0—the vision of the global organic movement and the need for scientific support, Org Agric, 7, 3, pp. 199-207, (2017)
[3]  
Blackstock K.L., Ingram J., Burton R., Brown K.M., Slee B., Understanding and influencing behaviour change by farmers to improve water quality, Sci Total Environ, 408, 23, pp. 5631-5638, (2010)
[4]  
Bliss K., Padel S., Ducottet C., Evaluation of the usefulness of tools and end-user materials to farmers. D 2.2 of OK-Net Arable, (2017)
[5]  
Brown S., The doodle revolution: unlock the power to think differently, (2014)
[6]  
Bruce T.J.A., The CROPROTECT project and wider opportunities to improve farm productivity through web-based knowledge exchange, Food and Energy Security, 5, 2, pp. 89-96, (2016)
[7]  
Butler A., Lobley M., Resource management, knowledge and internet use on farms in South West England: a report for the SWARM knowledge hub, (2012)
[8]  
Caldbeck J., Sumption P., Mind the gap–exploring the yield gaps between conventional and organic arable and potato crops, Organic Research Centre Bulletin, 121, pp. 9-15, (2016)
[9]  
Carr A., Wilkinson R., Beyond participation: boundary organizations as a new space for farmers and scientists to interact, Soc Nat Resour, 18, 3, pp. 255-265, (2005)
[10]  
Cullen B., Amos D., Padel S., Description of farmer innovation groups. D2.1 of OK Net Arable, (2016)