Manganese and Sulfate Removal from a Synthetic Mine Drainage Through Pilot Scale Bioreactor Batch Experiments

被引:0
作者
A. D. Karathanasis
J. D. Edwards
C. D. Barton
机构
[1] University of Kentucky,Department of Plant and Soil Sciences
[2] University of Kentucky,Department of Forestry
来源
Mine Water and the Environment | 2010年 / 29卷
关键词
Bioreactor; Manganese removal; Mine drainage; Sorption; Sulfate reduction; Sulfate/sulfide; Precipitation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Mine drainage is a significant problem in the Appalachian Plateau due to elevated metal and solute concentrations. Most metals may be removed by oxidation/precipitation or natural buffering, but Mn is more difficult to remove due to its higher solubility. Some mine drainages in southeastern Kentucky have average sulfate and Mn concentrations exceeding 1,300 and 30 mg L−1, respectively. Manganese does not readily form sulfidic minerals, and MnS precipitation following sulfate reduction has not proven to be a promising pathway for permanent Mn immobilization. Our study involved batch experiments with five different organic carbon sources in combination with five inorganic substrates to treat a simulated mine drainage with pH 6.2 and Mn and sulfate concentrations of 90 and 1,500 mg/L, respectively. The Mn removal capacity varied widely between treatment mixtures, from <10 to 100%. Sulfate removal showed a similar divergence, ranging from <10 to >80%. The most effective treatment was provided by the biosolids or wood mulch amendments in combination with the creek sediment. Sulfate reduction levels were not stoichiometrically matched with MnS formation, suggesting that the prevalent Mn removal mechanisms were sorption and precipitation as oxide, oxy-hydroxide and carbonate, rather than Mn-sulfide phases.
引用
收藏
页码:144 / 153
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Benner SG(1999)Geochemistry of a permeable reactive barrier for metals and acid mine drainage Environ Sci Technol 33 2793-2799
  • [2] Blowes DW(1984)The dependence of bacterial sulfate reduction on sulfate concentration in marine sediments Geochim Cosmochim Acta 48 2503-2516
  • [3] Gould WD(2005)A bench-scale assessment of a combined passive system to reduce concentrations of metals and sulphate in acid mine drainage Mine Water Environ 24 124-133
  • [4] Herbert RB(2006)Studies on removal of metal ions and sulphate reduction using rice husk and Chemosphere 62 699-708
  • [5] Ptacek CJ(2002) with reference to remediation of acid mine drainage Water Res 32 167-177
  • [6] Boudreau BP(2001)Multiple factor design for reactive mixture selection for use in reactive walls in mine drainage treatment J Environ Qual 30 2206-2209
  • [7] Westrich JT(2002)Rapd, sensitive, microscale determination of phosphate in water and soil Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 1 327-333
  • [8] Champagne P(2005)Treatment of acid mine drainage by sulphate-reducing bacteria using permeable reactive barriers: a review from laboratory to full-scale experiments Appl Geochem 20 1648-1657
  • [9] Van Geel P(2005)Municipal compost-based mixture for acid mine drainage bioremediation: metal retention mechanisms Sci Total Environ 338 115-124
  • [10] Parker W(1992)Biological manganese removal from acid mine drainage in constructed wetlands and prototype bioreactors J Contam Hydrol 9 115-131