Sensitivity Analysis of Process Parameters of Warm Spraying Process Based on Response Surface Method

被引:0
|
作者
Chang Li
Xing Gao
Yanpeng Yang
Xinxue Chen
Xing Han
机构
[1] University of Science and Technology Liaoning,School of Mechanical Engineering and Automation
来源
关键词
CFD; Monte Carlo method; sensitivity; warm spraying;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Warm spraying technology is a new type of low-temperature coating preparation technology based on the high-velocity oxygen fuel (HVOF) thermal spraying technology, which is often used to prepare titanium coatings. Titanium is widely used in aerospace, new energy, light industry and medicine due to its excellent corrosion resistance. In this paper, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is used to study the in-flight behavior of titanium particles during warm spraying. A one-step chemical model and an eddy dissipation model are used to simulate the propylene combustion reaction. The flight behavior of titanium particles in the flow field is tracked by the Lagrangian method. The impact of the barrel diameter on the flow field is analyzed emphatically. When the barrel diameter is 8 mm, the Mach cone is significantly affected by the shock wave at the barrel exit. On this basis, the Box–Behnken Design (BBD) method is used to design the response surface model (RSM). The response surface equation and Monte Carlo sampling are combined to calculate the sensitivity of different process parameters to the particle deposition temperature and velocity, which lays an essential theoretical foundation for optimizing process parameters and obtaining high-quality coating.
引用
收藏
页码:585 / 597
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Gaussian process-based response surface method for structural reliability analysis
    Su, Guoshao
    Jiang, Jianqing
    Yu, Bo
    Xiao, Yilong
    STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING AND MECHANICS, 2015, 56 (04) : 549 - 567
  • [22] Influence of Spraying Process Parameters on the Characteristics of Steel Coatings Produced by Arc Spraying Method
    Rakhadilov, Bauyrzhan
    Magazov, Nurtoleu
    Kakimzhanov, Dauir
    Apsezhanova, Akbota
    Molbossynov, Yermakhan
    Kengesbekov, Aidar
    COATINGS, 2024, 14 (09)
  • [23] Response surface method for the rapid design of process parameters in tube hydroforming
    Chebbah, M. S.
    Naceur, H.
    Hecini, M.
    Belouettar, S.
    NUMIFORM '07: MATERIALS PROCESSING AND DESIGN: MODELING, SIMULATION AND APPLICATIONS, PTS I AND II, 2007, 908 : 455 - +
  • [24] Preparation of chitosan nanospheres and optimization of process parameters by response surface method
    Yang, Yaqi
    Yang, Na
    Zheng, Chaolun
    Shao, Ziqiang
    POLYMER ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE, 2022, 62 (01): : 201 - 209
  • [25] Constrained Response Surface Optimisation for Precisely Atomising Spraying Process
    Suwankham, Y.
    Homrossukon, S.
    Luangpaiboon, P.
    INTERNATIONAL MULTICONFERENCE OF ENGINEERS AND COMPUTER SCIENTISTS (IMECS 2010), VOLS I-III, 2010, : 1618 - +
  • [26] Analysis of the Influence of Parameters of a Spraying System Designed for UAV Application on the Spraying Quality Based on Box-Behnken Response Surface Method
    Wang, Dashuai
    Xu, Sheng
    Li, Zhuolin
    Cao, Wujing
    AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2022, 12 (02):
  • [27] Experimental analysis of anodic coating process parameters of Al 5754 alloy by response surface method
    Celik, Ilhan
    Erdemir, Fatih
    Coruhlu, Isa
    SURFACE TOPOGRAPHY-METROLOGY AND PROPERTIES, 2023, 11 (02)
  • [28] Sensitivity analysis of drilling parameters in rock rotary drilling process based on orthogonal test method
    Li, Yanlong
    She, Lei
    Wen, Lifeng
    Zhang, Qiang
    ENGINEERING GEOLOGY, 2020, 270
  • [29] Prediction and optimization of process parameters of electrospun polyacrylonitrile based on numerical simulation and response surface method
    Chen, Peng
    Zhou, Qihong
    Chen, Ge
    Zhang, Qian
    Wang, Shaozong
    TEXTILE RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2021, 91 (19-20) : 2332 - 2344
  • [30] Process Optimization of Supersonic Plasma Transfer Arc Spraying Aluminum Coating by Response Surface Method
    Jin Ziang
    Liu Ming
    Zhu Lina
    Wang Haidou
    Wang Haijun
    Kang Jiajie
    CHINA SURFACE ENGINEERING, 2020, 33 (03) : 111 - 118