An evaluation of the response of yield monitors and combines to varying yields

被引:36
作者
Arslan S. [1 ]
Colvin T.S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering (ABE), Iowa State University, Ames, IA
[2] USDA, Agricultural Research Service, Ames, IA
关键词
Accuracy; Grain flow rate; Precision farming; Yield mapping; Yield monitor;
D O I
10.1023/A:1013887801918
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Comparisons were made between yield measurements with an impact based yield sensor and an electronic scale in adjacent harvest strips and on the same grain stream within a combine. Yield measurements in adjacent strip comparisons were more prone to errors as the segment lengths decreased. Grain yield difference between the yield sensor and electronic scale ranged from 5 to 14%, 4 to 13%, 3 to 12%, and 2 to 11% for 15, 30, 60, and 300 m long segments. The yield differences between neighboring segments might have been caused by yield variability to a degree; however, a consistent decrease in yield differences with increasing segment lengths implied that better accuracies could be obtained in longer management areas. The combine responses to grain yield changes and the effect of varying ground speed on accuracy were also evaluated by creating artificial yield patterns in harvest strips. Grain diffusion within the combine was more obvious when abrupt yield changes were introduced at known locations. Grain mixing and redistribution inside the combine may dictate the selection of segment sizes in the site-specific decision making process. Constant ground speed provided more stable grain flow values than varying ground speed. The average error in yield estimate was 3.4% and 5.2% at constant ground speed and varying speed, respectively. Careful calibration and constant combine speed were important to achieve better accuracy with the grain yield monitor.
引用
收藏
页码:107 / 122
页数:15
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
Ambuel J.R., Knowledge and decision support for variable rate application of materials in prescription farming, (1995)
[2]  
Anderson G.L., Yang C., Multispectral videography and geographic information systems for site-specific farm management, Precision Agriculture, Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Precision Agriculture, pp. 680-692, (1996)
[3]  
Auernhammer H., Demmel M., Muhr K., Rottmeier J., Wild K., Yield measurements on combine harvesters, (1993)
[4]  
Birrell S.J., Sudduth K.A., Borgelt S.C., Comparisons of sensors and techniques for crop yield mapping, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 14, pp. 215-233, (1996)
[5]  
Colvin T.S., Automated weighing and moisture sampling for a field-plot combine, Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 6, 6, pp. 713-714, (1990)
[6]  
Colvin T.S., Karlen D.L., Ambuel J.R., Perez-Munoz F., Yield monitoring for mapping, Precision Agriculture, Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Precision Agriculture, pp. 3-14, (1995)
[7]  
Doerge T., Weigh wagon vs. yield monitor comparison, Crop Insights, 7, 17, pp. 1-5, (1996)
[8]  
Howard K.D., Pringle J.L., Schrock M.D., Kuhlman D.K., Oard D., An elevator-based combine grain flow sensor, (1993)
[9]  
Mangold G., Yield monitors and precision farming system integrators, Successful Farming, pp. 37-40, (1996)
[10]  
Missotten B., Strubbe G., De Baerdemaeker J., Accuracy of grain and straw yield mapping, Precision Agriculture, Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Precision Agriculture, pp. 713-722, (1996)