Imaging Properties of Additive Manufactured (3D Printed) Materials for Potential Use for Phantom Models

被引:0
作者
Elizabeth Silvestro
Khalil N. Betts
Michael L. Francavilla
Savvas Andronikou
Raymond W. Sze
机构
[1] Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia,Children’s Hospital Additive Manufacturing for Pediatrics (CHAMP Lab)
[2] Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia,Department of Radiology
[3] Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania,undefined
来源
Journal of Digital Imaging | 2020年 / 33卷
关键词
3D printing; Additive manufacturing; Phantoms; Simulation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Over the last few decades, there has been growing interest in the application of additive manufacturing (AM) or 3D printing for medical research and clinical application. Imaging phantoms offer clear benefits in the way of training, planning, and quality assurance, but the model’s availability per catalog tend to be suited for general testing purposes only. AM, on the contrary, offers flexibility to clinicians by enabling custom-built phantoms based on specific interests or even individual patient needs. This study aims to quantify the radiographic properties (ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, and computed tomography) of common additive manufacturing technologies and to discuss potential opportunities to fabricate imaging phantoms. Test phantoms were composed of samples from the three most common AM styles, namely PolyJet, fused deposition modeling (FDM), and stereolithography (SLA). Test imaging of the phantoms was performed on ultrasound, MRI, and CT and reviewed and evaluated with radiology software. The ultrasound images showed clearly defined upper and lower edges of the material but did not demonstrate distinct differences in internal echogenicity between materials. The MR scans revealed a distinct signal intensity difference between the model (17 grayscale value) and the printer support (778 grayscale value). Finally, the CT images showed a slight variation between the plastic (82 HU) and rubber (145 HU) materials. The radiographic properties of AM offer a clear opportunity to create basic two- or three-material phantoms. These would be high-accuracy and cost-effective models. Although the materials currently available are not suitable for complex multi-material applications as realistic as true human anatomy, one can easily foresee the development of new materials with broader density in the near future.
引用
收藏
页码:456 / 464
页数:8
相关论文
共 103 条
[1]  
George E(2017)Measuring and establishing the accuracy and reproducibility of 3D printed medical models RadioGraphics. 37 1424-1450
[2]  
Liacouras P(2015)Medical 3D printing for the radiologist RadioGraphics. 35 1965-1988
[3]  
Rybicki FJ(2017)“Black bone” MRI: A novel imaging technique for 3D printing Dentomaxillofacial Radiol Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 46 46-2006
[4]  
Mitsouras D(2016)Construction of realistic phantoms from patient images and a commercial three-dimensional printer J Med Imaging. 3 033501-294
[5]  
Mitsouras D(2015)Three-dimensional physical modeling: Applications and experience at Mayo Clinic RadioGraphics. 35 1989-5474
[6]  
Liacouras P(2016)3D-printed shepp-Logan phantom as a real-world benchmark for MRI Magn Reson Med. 75 287-575
[7]  
Imanzadeh A(2017)A novel 3D-printed phantom insert for 4D PET/CT imaging and simultaneous integrated boost radiotherapy Med Phys. 44 5467-972
[8]  
Giannopoulos AA(2017)Imaging properties of 3D printed materials: multi-energy CT of filament polymers J Digit Imaging. 30 572-575
[9]  
Cai T(2017)Soft 3D-printed phantom of the human kidney with collecting system Ann Biomed Eng. 45 963-622
[10]  
Kumamaru KK(2017)Radiopaque three-dimensional printing: A method to create realistic CT phantoms Radiology. 282 569-433