Energy intensity improvement and energy productivity changes: an analysis of BRICS and G7 countries

被引:0
作者
Ching-Ren Chiu
Ming-Chung Chang
Jin-Li Hu
机构
[1] University of Taipei,Department of Recreation and Sports Management
[2] Chihlee University of Technology,Department of Finance
[3] National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University,Institute of Business and Management
来源
Journal of Productivity Analysis | 2022年 / 57卷
关键词
Energy intensity improvement; Global metafrontier Malmquist productivity index; Intertemporal technology gap change;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This research defines the energy intensity target of the contemporaneous metafrontier and global metafrontier in order to assist decision-makers at identifying the efficient energy intensity target. We find that the sources of energy intensity improvement under the global metafrontier are due to three reasons: managerial inefficiency, technology gap inefficiency, and global technology gap inefficiency. In addition, the measurement of the energy intensity target also extends to that of energy productivity changes. The research applies data envelopment analysis (DEA) to empirically study Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa (BRICS) and the Group of Seven (G7) countries and demonstrates that the BRICS group exhibits a larger scope for energy intensity improvement than the G7 group, but that both groups should still pay greater attention to energy technology promotion to improve energy intensity. A win–win strategy for the two groups to achieve this is by fully realizing energy technology transfer from high-tech to low-tech countries.
引用
收藏
页码:297 / 311
页数:14
相关论文
共 182 条
  • [11] Chang MC(2016)Does FDI influence renewable energy consumption? an analysis of sectoral FDI impact on renewable and non-renewable industrial energy consumption Energy Econ 54 291-301
  • [12] Chang MC(2016)Energy efficiency analysis of G7 and BRICS considering total-factor structure J Clean Prod 122 67-77
  • [13] Chang MC(1994)Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries Am Econ Rev 84 66-83
  • [14] Cherchye L(2016)Energy efficiency and production technology heterogeneity in China’s agricultural sector: a meta-frontier approach Technol Forecast Soc Change 109 25-34
  • [15] Kuosmanen T(2017)The approach to realizing the potential of emissions reduction in China: an implication from data envelopment analysis Renew Sust Energ Rev 71 859-872
  • [16] Post T(2018)Decomposition of energy efficiency and energy-saving potential in China: a three-hierarchy meta-frontier approach J Clean Prod 176 1054-1064
  • [17] Chiu CR(2015)Measuring energy inefficiency with undesirable outputs and technology heterogeneity in Chinese cities Econ Model 49 46-52
  • [18] Liou JL(2006)Total-factor energy efficiency of regions in China Energy Policy 34 3206-3217
  • [19] Wu PI(2013)Measuring non-convex metafrontier efficiency in international tourist hotels J Oper Res Soc 64 250-259
  • [20] Fang CL(2020)Metafrontier productivity indices: questioning the common convexification strategy Eur J Oper Res 283 737-747