The Impact of Property Condition Disclosure Laws on Housing Prices: Evidence from an Event Study Using Propensity Scores

被引:0
作者
Anupam Nanda
Stephen L. Ross
机构
[1] University of Connecticut,Department of Economics
来源
The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics | 2012年 / 45卷
关键词
Property condition disclosure; Housing price index; Propensity score matching; Event study;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We examine the impact of seller’s Property Condition Disclosure Laws on residential real estate values. A disclosure law may address the information asymmetry in housing transactions shifting risk from buyers and brokers to the sellers and raising housing prices as a result. We combine propensity score techniques from the treatment effects literature with a traditional event study approach. We assemble a unique set of economic and institutional attributes for a quarterly panel of 291 US Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) across 50 US States spanning 21 years from 1984 to 2004. The study finds that the average sales price of houses in a metropolitan area increases by an additional 3 to 4% over a 4 year period if the state adopts a Property Condition Disclosure Law, which is consistent with approximately a 19 basis point or 6.4% reduction in the risk premium associated with purchasing owner-occupied housing. When we compare the results from parametric and semi-parametric (propensity score) event analyses, we find that the semi-parametric analysis generates moderately larger estimated effects of the law on housing prices.
引用
收藏
页码:88 / 109
页数:21
相关论文
共 66 条
  • [1] Akerlof GA(1970)The market for “lemons”: quality uncertainty and the market mechanism The Quarterly Journal of Economics 84 488-500
  • [2] Becker SO(2002)Estimation of average treatment effects based on propensity scores The Stata Journal 2 358-377
  • [3] Ichino A(2000)Pricing, exposure and residential listing strategies Journal of Real Estate Research 20 61-74
  • [4] Benjamin JD(2005)An event study of the Rhenish-Westphalian coal syndicate European Review of Economic History 9 337-364
  • [5] Chinloy PT(2006)Why do REIT’s repurchase stock? Extricating the effect of managerial signaling in open market share repurchase announcements Journal of Real Estate Research 28 1-23
  • [6] Bittner T(2009)What moves housing markets: A variance decomposition of the rent-price ratio Journal of Urban Economics 66 90-102
  • [7] Brau JC(2009)On the robustness of racial discrimination findings in mortgage lending studies Applied Economics 41 2279-2297
  • [8] Holmes A(1981)Several tests for model specification in the presence of alternative hypotheses Econometrica 49 781-793
  • [9] Campbell S. D.(1999)Causal effects in nonexperimental studies: reevaluating the evaluation of training programs Journal of the American Statistical Association 94 1053-1062
  • [10] Davis M. A.(2005)Homeowners’ repeat-sale gains, dual agency and repeated use of the same agent Journal of Real Estate Research 27 267-292