Assessment of carbon footprint in the construction phase of high-rise constructions in Tehran

被引:0
作者
T. Jafary Nasab
S. M. Monavari
S. A. Jozi
H. Majedi
机构
[1] Islamic Azad University,Department of Environmental Science, Faculty of Natural Resources and Environment, Science and Research Branch
[2] Islamic Azad University,Department of Environment
[3] Islamic Azad University,Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture and Art, Science and Research Branch
来源
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology | 2020年 / 17卷
关键词
Life-cycle assessment; Residential tower; Carbon footprint; CO; emissions;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study, with the life-cycle approach, examines the carbon footprint of a residential tower in the Tehran Metropolitan City in the construction phase. This paper assessed all sources of carbon emissions in the construction phase, including emissions from manufacturing and extraction of building materials, transportation of building materials, construction equipment, vegetation cover around the building, and transportation of construction waste. According to the results, the highest amounts of carbon footprint were estimated at 83% and 14%, which were, respectively, related to the emissions from transportation of materials and construction wastes. The emissions from the construction phase accounted for the 3% of the total footprints. Also in the manufacturing process of building materials, the highest contributions in CO2 emissions were 78%, 10%, and 6%, belonging to concrete, rebar, and cement mortar, respectively. The results of this study can be used as a criterion for comparing and assessing the preventative measures to reduce and manage CO2 emissions in the construction of similar buildings. The approaches that exist for reducing CO2 emissions in construction include management of amount of waste generated and choosing the types of environmentally friendly building materials and providing materials from factories near the site.
引用
收藏
页码:3153 / 3164
页数:11
相关论文
共 84 条
[1]  
Biswas WK(2014)Carbon footprint and embodied energy consumption assessment of building construction works in Western Australia Int J Sustain Built Environ 3 179-186
[2]  
Cho S(2016)A study on life cycle CO Sustainability 8 579-259
[3]  
Chae C(2017) emissions of low-carbon building in South Korea Sustainability 9 1426-179
[4]  
Guo H(2015)A comparison of the energy saving and carbon reduction performance between reinforced concrete and cross-laminated timber structures in residential buildings in the severe cold region of China Clean Prod 103 249-1017
[5]  
Liu Y(2018)Greenhouse gas emissions during the construction phase of a building: a case study in China Build Environ 142 171-455
[6]  
Meng Y(2017)Global warming potential and energy consumption of temporary works in building construction: a case study in Hong Kong Procedia Eng 198 1007-250
[7]  
Huang H(2013)Carbon footprint and carbon emission reduction of urban buildings: a case in Xiamen City, China Sci World J 2013 175702-188
[8]  
Sun C(2018)Life comparative analysis of energy consumption and CO2 emissions of different building structural frame types Sustainability 10 365-9
[9]  
Shao Y(2013)A study on the analysis of CO Build Environ 59 448-720
[10]  
Hong J(2019) emissions of apartment housing in the construction process Build Environ 151 240-508