共 43 条
[1]
Kelly J(2014)Peer review in scientific publications: benefits, critiques, and a survival guide EJIFCC 25 227-243
[2]
Sadeghieh T(2007)The relationship of previous training and experience of journal peer reviewers to subsequent review quality PLoS Med 4 e40-182
[3]
Adeli K(2010)Problems with peer review BMJ 340 c1409-676
[4]
Callaham ML(2006)Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals J R Soc Med 99 178-897
[5]
Tercier J(2019)Peer review bias: a critical review Mayo Clin Proc 94 670-1316
[6]
Henderson M(2015)Blinded by the light: anonymization should be used in peer review to prevent bias, not protect referees EMBO Rep 16 894-12713
[7]
Smith R(2016)Single-blind vs double-blind peer review in the setting of author prestige JAMA 316 1315-540
[8]
Haffar S(2017)Reviewer bias in single- versus double-blind peer review Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114 12708-2395
[9]
Bazerbachi F(2019)Are gender gaps due to evaluations of the applicant or the science? A natural experiment at a national funding agency Lancet 393 531-285
[10]
Murad MH(2015)Peer-review fraud – hacking the scientific publication process N Engl J Med 373 2393-642