C1 Inhibitor Gene Sequence Facilitates Frameshift Mutations

被引:0
作者
John J. Bissler
Qin-Shao Meng
Theresa Emery
机构
[1] The Children’s Hospital Research Foundation #5,
来源
Molecular Medicine | 1998年 / 4卷
关键词
Frameshift Mutations; Imperfect Inverted Repeat Sequences; Superhelical Tension; Hereditary Angioneurotic Edema; Slipped Mispairing;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Mutations disrupting the function or production of C1 inhibitor cause the disease hereditary angioneurotic edema. Patient mutations identified an imperfect inverted repeat sequence that was postulated to play a mechanistic role in the mutations. To test this hypothesis, the inverted repeat was cloned into the chloramphenicol acetyltransferase gene in pBR325 and its mutation rate was studied in four bacterial strains. These strains were selected to assay the effects of recombination and superhelical tension on mutation frequency. Mutations that revert bacteria to chloramphenicol resistance (Cmr) were scored. Both pairs of isogenic strains had reversion frequencies of approximately 10−8. These rare reversion events in bacteria were most often a frameshift that involved the imperfect inverted repeat with a deletion or a tandem duplication, an event very similar to the human mutations. Increased DNA superhelical tension, which would be expected to enhance cruciform extrusion, did not accentuate mutagenesis. This finding suggests that the imperfect inverted repeat may form a stem-loop structure in the single-stranded DNA created by the duplex DNA melting prior to replication. Models explaining the slippage can be drawn using the lagging strand of the replication fork. In this model, the formation of a stem-loop structure is responsible for bringing the end of the deletion or duplication into close proximity.
引用
收藏
页码:795 / 806
页数:11
相关论文
共 87 条
[1]  
Bissler JJ(1994)Contiguous deletion and duplication mutations resulting in type 1 hereditary angioneurotic edema Hum. Genet. 93 265-269
[2]  
Donaldson VH(1997)Molecular defects in hereditary angioneurotic edema Proc. Assoc. Am. Phys. 109 164-173
[3]  
Davis AR(1983)Updating the theory of mutation Am. Sci. 71 621-630
[4]  
Bissler JJ(1984)Bacteriophage T4 particles are refractory to bisulfite mutagenesis Mutat. Res. 129 149-152
[5]  
Aulak KS(1987)Local DNA sequence control of deletion formation in Genetics 115 41-49
[6]  
Donaldson VH(1984) plasmid pBR322 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 81 512-516
[7]  
Drake JW(1991)Structural intermediates of deletion mutagenesis: a role for palindromic DNA E. coli. Nature 352 544-547
[8]  
Glickman BW(1993)Preferential DNA secondary structure mutagenesis in the lagging strand of replication in Escherichia coli. Genetics 134 409-422
[9]  
Ripley L(1991)The influence of primary and secondary DNA structure in deletion and duplication between direct repeats in J. Mol. Biol. 221 805-821
[10]  
Ripley LS(1992)An in vitro approach to identifying specificity determinants of mutagenesis mediated by DNA misalignments Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 89 1016-1020