Cost-Benefit Analysis of Communities That Care Outcomes at Eighth Grade

被引:0
作者
Margaret R. Kuklinski
John S. Briney
J. David Hawkins
Richard F. Catalano
机构
[1] University of Washington,Social Development Research Group, School of Social Work
来源
Prevention Science | 2012年 / 13卷
关键词
Cost-benefit analysis; Community-based intervention; Prevention;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper presents a cost-benefit analysis of the Communities That Care (CTC) prevention system, a public health approach to reducing risk, enhancing protection, and reducing the prevalence of adolescent health and behavior problems community wide. The analysis is based on outcomes from a panel of students followed from Grade 5 through Grade 8 in a randomized controlled trial involving 24 communities in 7 states. Previous analyses have shown that CTC prevented the initiation of cigarette smoking, alcohol use, and delinquency by the end of 8th grade in CTC communities compared to controls. This paper estimates long-term monetary benefits associated with significant intervention effects on cigarette smoking and delinquency as compared to the cost of conducting the intervention. Under conservative cost assumptions, the net present benefit is $5,250 per youth, including $812 from the prevention of cigarette smoking and $4,438 from the prevention of delinquency. The benefit-cost ratio indicates a return of $5.30 per $1.00 invested. Under less conservative but still viable cost assumptions, the benefit-cost ratio due to prevention of cigarette smoking and delinquency increases to $10.23 per $1.00 invested. Benefits from CTC’s reduction in alcohol initiation as well as broader inclusion of quality-of-life gains would further increase CTC’s benefit-cost ratio. Results provide evidence that CTC is a cost-beneficial preventive intervention and a good investment of public dollars, even under very conservative cost and benefit assumptions.
引用
收藏
页码:150 / 161
页数:11
相关论文
共 82 条
  • [1] Barnett WS(1993)Economic evaluation of home visiting programs The Future of Children 3 93-112
  • [2] Barnett WS(2007)Comparative benefit–cost analysis of the Abecedarian Program and its policy implications Economics of Education Review 26 113-125
  • [3] Masse LN(2006)The High/Scope Perry Preschool Program: Cost–benefit analysis using data from the age-40 followup The Journal of Human Resources 41 162-190
  • [4] Belfield C. R.(1996)Smoking cessation in young adults: Age at initiation of cigarette smoking and other suspected influences American Journal of Public Health 86 214-220
  • [5] Nores M.(2009)Design and analysis of the Community Youth Development Study longitudinal cohort sample Evaluation Review 33 311-334
  • [6] Barnett S.(2009)New evidence on the monetary value of saving a high risk youth Journal of Quantitative Criminology 25 25-49
  • [7] Schweinhart L.(2008)Implementing effective community-based prevention programs in the Community Youth Development Study Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice 6 256-278
  • [8] Breslau N(2005)Standards of evidence: Criteria for efficacy, effectiveness and dissemination Prevention Science 6 151-175
  • [9] Peterson EL(2003)Issues in the economic evaluation of prevention programs Applied Developmental Science 7 76-86
  • [10] Brown EC(2007)Measuring time costs in interventions designed to reduce behavior problems among children and youth American Journal of Community Psychology 40 64-81