The burden of prolonged indwelling catheter after acute urinary retention in Ikeja - Lagos, Nigeria

被引:25
|
作者
Ikuerowo S.O. [1 ]
Ogunade A.A. [1 ]
Ogunlowo T.O. [1 ]
Uzodimma C.C. [1 ,2 ]
Esho J.O. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Surgery, Lagos State University College of Medicine, Lagos State University Teaching Hospital Ikeja, Lagos
[2] National Orthopedic Hospital, Igbobi, Lagos
关键词
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia; Lower Urinary Tract Symptom; International Prostate Symptom Score; Acute Urinary Retention; Urethral Catheter;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2490-7-16
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background. Acute urinary retention (AUR) is a common urological problem. We have observed a growing list of patients on indwelling bladder catheter awaiting surgery after AUR. This study was aimed at identifying the health, financial and quality of life (QoL) implications of prolonged use of indwelling catheter in these patients. Methods. We review the side-effects, QoL and cost of changing an indwelling catheter among patients who were on the waiting list for definitive surgery after AUR. All the 62 patients who presented to weekly catheter clinic for change of the indwelling catheter were recruited over a 3 - week period into the study. Results. The mean age of the patients was 57.5 years and the mean catheter use time was 23 months. The aetiology of AUR was BPH in 40 (64%) and urethral trauma in 16 (28.4%) of the patients. The common side effects of prolonged catheterization included urethral/suprapubic pain, bleeding per urethram, loss of dignity, loss of job or being out of school, lack of sexual intercourse, pericatheter leakage of urine and recurrent urinary tract infection. The cost of change of the indwelling catheter to the patient each time ranged from 460.00 - 2500.00 Naira (averaged 789.67 Naira). The total annual cost for the change of indwelling catheter after AUR in our catheter clinic was estimated to be 7,350,000.00 Naira (58,800 US dollars) with 1,890,000.00 Naira (15,120 US dollars) being the cost borne by the patients per annum and the rest being government subsidy. Fifty-three (85.5%) patients described that they were unhappy. There was a significant correlation between QoL and the presence of pain (p = 0.015) and bleeding (p = 0.042) associated with the presence of an indwelling catheter. Conclusion. The need to have an indwelling catheter for a prolonged period after AUR is a painful experience and associated with several side-effects. This has a significant negative effect on the patients' QoL and constitutes a significant financial burden to the patients and the government. We suggest that measures should be put in place to reduce the waiting time for surgery and therefore the catheterization time among the patients with AUR. © 2007 Ikuerowo et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] Prolonged use of indwelling urinary catheter following acute urinary retention in a tertiary care centre in sub-Saharan Africa: Causes, costs and concerns
    Bello, J. O.
    Ushie, F. A.
    Kuranga, S. A.
    Ajape, A. A.
    Olute, A. O.
    Olanrewaju, M. O.
    AFRICAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 19 (02) : 82 - 87
  • [2] Randomized controlled trial on the efficacy of bladder training before removing the indwelling urinary catheter in patients with acute urinary retention associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia
    Yuan Zhengyong
    He Changxiao
    Yan Shibing
    Wu Caiwen
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 48 (04) : 400 - 404
  • [3] Morbidity and the impact on daily activities associated with catheter drainage after acute urinary retention
    Khoubehi, B
    Watkin, NA
    Mee, AD
    Ogden, CW
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2000, 85 (09) : 1033 - 1036
  • [4] Association of acute urinary retention in postoperative patients with a urinary catheter, with and without bladder catheter clamping
    Guzman-Esquivel, Jose
    Estephania Farias-Mendoza, Katia
    Gabriel Ortega-Ortiz, Jose
    Delgado-Enciso, Ivan
    Murillo-Zamora, Efren
    Alejandro Guzman-Solorzano, Jose
    Regina Ochoa-Castro, Maria
    ARCHIVOS ESPANOLES DE UROLOGIA, 2021, 74 (08): : 747 - 751
  • [5] Acute urinary retention on acute prostatitis: transurethral or sub pubic catheter?
    Bruyere, Franck
    d'Arcier, Benjamin Faivre
    PROGRES EN UROLOGIE, 2009, 19 (04): : F123 - F125
  • [6] Predictors of successful trial without catheter in acute urinary retention
    Zeif, Hans-Joerg
    Wallace, D. Michael A.
    Subramonian, Kesavapillai
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL UROLOGY, 2010, 3 (01) : 5 - 10
  • [7] ALPHA-BLOCKERS INCREASE THE CHANCES OF A SUCCESSFUL TRIAL WITHOUT CATHETER AFTER ACUTE URINARY RETENTION
    Rendell, Simon
    Sultan, Laith
    EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2011, 28 (02) : 161 - 165
  • [8] Burden of illness among intermittent catheter users with non-neurogenic urinary retention in Denmark
    Buchter, Marie Lynge
    Kjellberg, Jakob
    Ibsen, Rikke
    Sternhufvud, Catarina
    Petersen, Birte
    EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2023, 23 (04) : 409 - 418
  • [9] Factors Associated with the Success of Trial without Catheter in Acute Urinary Retention due to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
    Dinh Thi Phuong Hoai
    Luu Lam Thang Tai
    Tran Thai Huu Loc
    Mohamed, Muawia Yousif Fadlelmola
    Ahmed, Ali Mahmoud
    Nguyen Tien Huy
    Le Dinh Khanh
    UROLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 32 (02) : 71 - 76
  • [10] Immediate or delayed trial without catheter in acute urinary retention in males: A systematic review
    Christensen, Veronika S.
    Skow, Marius
    Flottorp, Signe A.
    Stromme, Hilde
    Mdala, Ibrahimu
    Vallersnes, Odd Martin
    BJUI COMPASS, 2024, 5 (08): : 732 - 747