Clinical Experience of Prenatal Chromosomal Microarray Analysis in 6159 Ultrasonically Abnormal Fetuses

被引:0
作者
Tingting Song
Ying Xu
Yu Li
Jiao Zheng
Fenfen Guo
Xin Jin
Jia Li
Jianfang Zhang
Hong Yang
机构
[1] Xijing Hospital,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
[2] Fourth Military Medical University,undefined
来源
Reproductive Sciences | 2024年 / 31卷
关键词
Prenatal diagnosis; Ultrasound abnormalities; Copy number variations; Chromosomal microarray analysis; Uniparental disomy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
A single-center retrospective study of G-band karyotyping and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) for the invasive prenatal diagnosis of 6159 fetuses with ultrasound abnormalities was conducted. This study aimed to investigate the incidence rates of chromosomal abnormalities and pregnancy outcomes and postpartum clinical manifestations by long-term follow-up and to explore the correlation between different types of prenatal ultrasound abnormalities and pathogenic chromosomal abnormalities. The overall incidence of pathogenic chromosomal aberrations in fetuses with ultrasound abnormalities was 7.58% (467/6159), which comprised 41.7% (195/467) with chromosome number abnormalities, 57.6% (269/467) with pathogenic copy-number variations (pCNVs), and 0.64% (3/467) with uniparental disomy (UPD). In addition, 1.72% (106/6159) with likely pathogenic copy-number variations (lpCNVs) and 3.04% (187/6159) with variants of unknown significance (VOUS) were detected by CMA. Ultrasound abnormalities were categorized into structural anomalies and soft marker anomalies. The incidence rate of pathogenic and likely pathogenic chromosomal abnormalities was significantly higher among fetuses with structural anomalies than soft markers (11.13% vs 7.59%, p < 0.01). We retrospectively analyzed the prenatal genetic outcomes for a large cohort of fetuses with different types of ultrasound abnormalities. The present study showed that the chromosomal abnormality rate and clinical outcomes of fetuses with different types of ultrasound abnormalities varied greatly. Our data have important implications for prenatal genetic counseling for fetuses with different types of ultrasound abnormalities.
引用
收藏
页码:1089 / 1107
页数:18
相关论文
共 88 条
  • [1] Mone F(2021)Evidence to support the clinical utility of prenatal exome sequencing in evaluation of the fetus with congenital anomalies: scientific impact paper No. 64 [February] 2021 BJOG. 128 e39-e50
  • [2] McMullan DJ(2021)Prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis in 2466 fetuses with ultrasonographic soft markers: a prospective cohort study Am J Obstet Gynecol. 224 516-1377
  • [3] Williams D(2021)Clinical application of chromosomal microarray analysis in pregnant women with advanced maternal age and fetuses with ultrasonographic soft markers Med Sci Monit. 27 e929074-764
  • [4] Hu T(2013)Committee Opinion No. 581: the use of chromosomal microarray analysis in prenatal diagnosis Obstet Gynecol. 122 1374-68
  • [5] Tian T(2010)Consensus statement: chromosomal microarray is a first-tier clinical diagnostic test for individuals with developmental disabilities or congenital anomalies Am J Hum Genet. 86 749-212
  • [6] Zhang Z(2018)The use of chromosomal microarray analysis in prenatal diagnosis Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 45 55-343
  • [7] Hu ZM(2018)Prenatal diagnosis by chromosomal microarray analysis Fertil Steril. 109 201-3524
  • [8] Li LL(2012)Genomic microarrays: a technology overview Prenat Diagn. 32 336-257
  • [9] Zhang H(2022)Single nucleotide polymorphism array in genetic evaluation of fetal ultrasound abnormalities: a retrospective follow-up study Am J Transl Res. 14 3516-205
  • [10] Miller DT(2020)Clinical utility of SNP array analysis in prenatal diagnosis: a cohort study of 5000 pregnancies Front Genet. 11 571219-161