Individual differences in cognitive offloading: a comparison of intention offloading, pattern copy, and short-term memory capacity

被引:0
|
作者
Hauke S. Meyerhoff
Sandra Grinschgl
Frank Papenmeier
Sam J. Gilbert
机构
[1] Leibniz-Institut Für Wissensmedien,
[2] University of Tübingen,undefined
[3] University of Graz,undefined
[4] University College London,undefined
来源
Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications | / 6卷
关键词
Individual differences; Reliability; Cognitive offloading; Intention offloading task; Pattern copy task;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The cognitive load of many everyday life tasks exceeds known limitations of short-term memory. One strategy to compensate for information overload is cognitive offloading which refers to the externalization of cognitive processes such as reminder setting instead of memorizing. There appears to be remarkable variance in offloading behavior between participants which poses the question whether there is a common factor influencing offloading behavior across different tasks tackling short-term memory processes. To pursue this question, we studied individual differences in offloading behavior between two well-established offloading paradigms: the intention offloading task which tackles memory for intentions and the pattern copy task which tackles continuous short-term memory load. Our study also included an unrelated task measuring short-term memory capacity. Each participant completed all tasks twice on two consecutive days in order to obtain reliability scores. Despite high reliability scores, individual differences in offloading behavior were uncorrelated between the two offloading tasks. In both tasks, however, individual differences in offloading behavior were correlated with the individual differences in an unrelated short-term memory task. Our results therefore show that offloading behavior cannot simply be explained in terms of a single common factor driving offloading behavior across tasks. We discuss the implications of this finding for future research investigating the interrelations of offloading behavior across different tasks.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Binding and inhibition in working memory: Individual and age differences in short-term recognition
    Oberauer, K
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2005, 134 (03) : 368 - 387
  • [22] Short-Term Memory Capacity Predicts Willingness to Expend Cognitive Effort for Reward
    Forys, Brandon J.
    Winstanley, Catharine A.
    Kingstone, Alan
    Todd, Rebecca M.
    ENEURO, 2024, 11 (07) : 6 - 17
  • [23] REHEARSAL OF INDIVIDUAL ITEMS IN SHORT-TERM MEMORY
    MEUNIER, GF
    MEUNIER, JA
    RITZ, D
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1972, 95 (02): : 465 - &
  • [24] Visual short-term memory: Central capacity limitations in short-term consolidation
    Stevanovski, Biljana
    Jolicoeur, Pierre
    VISUAL COGNITION, 2007, 15 (05) : 532 - 563
  • [25] SHORT-TERM VISUAL MEMORY AND PATTERN MASKING
    MITCHELL, DC
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1972, 24 (NOV): : 394 - &
  • [26] Estimating the capacity of phonological short-term memory
    Gathercole, SE
    Pickering, SJ
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1999, 34 (5-6) : 378 - 382
  • [27] Reconsideration of the capacity limits of short-term memory
    Cui, Jianxia
    Wu, Yanhong
    Liu, Yanfang
    Beijing Daxue Xuebao (Ziran Kexue Ban)/Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis, 2004, 40 (04): : 676 - 682
  • [28] SHORT-TERM MEMORY AND LIMITED CAPACITY HYPOTHESIS
    BADDELEY, AD
    SCOTT, D
    DRYNAN, R
    SMITH, JC
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1969, 60 : 51 - &
  • [29] The impact of individual short-term memory capacity on choice overload effect: Is there stimulus specificity?
    Lv, Chenyu
    Turel, Ofir
    He, Qinghua
    DECISION, 2023, 50 (04) : 403 - 414
  • [30] The impact of individual short-term memory capacity on choice overload effect: Is there stimulus specificity?
    Chenyu Lv
    Ofir Turel
    Qinghua He
    DECISION, 2023, 50 : 403 - 414