Measuring the impact of COVID-19 vaccine misinformation on vaccination intent in the UK and USA

被引:1077
作者
Loomba, Sahil [1 ]
de Figueiredo, Alexandre [2 ]
Piatek, Simon J. [2 ]
de Graaf, Kristen [2 ]
Larson, Heidi J. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Coll London, Dept Math, London, England
[2] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Dept Infect Dis Epidemiol, Vaccine Confidence Project, London, England
[3] Univ Washington, Dept Hlth Metr & Evaluat, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[4] Univ Antwerp, Vaccine & Infect Dis Inst, Ctr Evaluat Vaccinat, Antwerp, Belgium
关键词
PUBLIC-HEALTH; HESITANCY; EXPOSURE; OPINION; NEWS;
D O I
10.1038/s41562-021-01056-1
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
A randomized controlled trial reveals that exposure to recent online misinformation around a COVID-19 vaccine induces a decline in intent to vaccinate among adults in the UK and the USA. Widespread acceptance of a vaccine for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) will be the next major step in fighting the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, but achieving high uptake will be a challenge and may be impeded by online misinformation. To inform successful vaccination campaigns, we conducted a randomized controlled trial in the UK and the USA to quantify how exposure to online misinformation around COVID-19 vaccines affects intent to vaccinate to protect oneself or others. Here we show that in both countries-as of September 2020-fewer people would 'definitely' take a vaccine than is likely required for herd immunity, and that, relative to factual information, recent misinformation induced a decline in intent of 6.2 percentage points (95th percentile interval 3.9 to 8.5) in the UK and 6.4 percentage points (95th percentile interval 4.0 to 8.8) in the USA among those who stated that they would definitely accept a vaccine. We also find that some sociodemographic groups are differentially impacted by exposure to misinformation. Finally, we show that scientific-sounding misinformation is more strongly associated with declines in vaccination intent.
引用
收藏
页码:337 / +
页数:14
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]   What policy makers need to know about COVID-19 protective immunity [J].
Altmann, Daniel M. ;
Douek, Daniel C. ;
Boyton, Rosemary J. .
LANCET, 2020, 395 (10236) :1527-1529
[2]   The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2 [J].
Andersen, Kristian G. ;
Rambaut, Andrew ;
Lipkin, W. Ian ;
Holmes, Edward C. ;
Garry, Robert F. .
NATURE MEDICINE, 2020, 26 (04) :450-452
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2019, PYSTAN PYTHON INTERF
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Census regions and divisions of the United States
[5]  
[Anonymous], OVERVIEW 3 NUTS 2 LA
[6]   Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook [J].
Bakshy, Eytan ;
Messing, Solomon ;
Adamic, Lada A. .
SCIENCE, 2015, 348 (6239) :1130-1132
[7]   Communication and miscommunication of risk: understanding UK parents' attitudes to combined MMR vaccination [J].
Bellaby, P .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 327 (7417) :725-728
[8]   Nonparametric analysis of treatment effects in ordered response models [J].
Boes, Stefan .
EMPIRICAL ECONOMICS, 2013, 44 (01) :81-109
[9]   Vaccine misinformation and social media [J].
Burki, Talha .
LANCET DIGITAL HEALTH, 2019, 1 (06) :E258-E259
[10]   Modelling monotonic effects of ordinal predictors in Bayesian regression models [J].
Burkner, Paul-Christian ;
Charpentier, Emmanuel .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL & STATISTICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 73 (03) :420-451