Response style corrected market segmentation for ordinal data

被引:0
作者
Bettina Grün
Sara Dolnicar
机构
[1] Johannes Kepler University Linz,
[2] University of Queensland,undefined
[3] St Lucia,undefined
来源
Marketing Letters | 2016年 / 27卷
关键词
Market segmentation; Ordinal data; Response style; Heterogeneity;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Survey data collected for market segmentation studies is typically ordinal in nature. As such, it is susceptible to response styles. Ignoring response styles can lead to market segments which do not differ in beliefs, but merely in how segment members use survey answer options and which possibly occur in addition to the belief segments. We propose a finite mixture model which simultaneously segments and corrects for response styles, permits heterogeneity in both beliefs and response styles, accommodates a range of different response styles, does not impose a certain relationship between the response style and belief segments, and is suitable for ordinal data. The performance of the model is tested using both artificial and empirical survey data.
引用
收藏
页码:729 / 741
页数:12
相关论文
共 59 条
  • [1] Baumgartner H(2001)Response styles in marketing research: a cross-national investigation Journal of Marketing Research 38 143-156
  • [2] Steenkamp J-BEM(2014)How collinearity affects mixture regression results Marketing Letters 45 77-93
  • [3] Becker J-M(2008)Recommendation system with purchase data Journal of Marketing Research 94 43-52
  • [4] Ringle CM(1999)A hierarchical latent variable model for ordinal data from a customer satisfaction survey with “no answer” responses Journal of the American Statistical Association 16 1190-1208
  • [5] Sarstedt M(1995)A limited memory algorithm for bound constrained optimization SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 39 1-38
  • [6] Völckner F(1977)Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the em-algorithm Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B: Statistical Methodology 1 140-160
  • [7] Bodapati AV(2007)Assessing analytical robustness in cross-cultural comparisons International Journal of Tourism, Culture, and Hospitality Research 11 89-121
  • [8] Bradlow ET(1996)Flexible smoothing with B-splines and penalties Statistical Science 35 263-282
  • [9] Zaslavsky AM(2004)Standardization to account for cross-cultural response bias: a classification of score adjustment procedures and review of research in JCCP Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 97 611-631
  • [10] Byrd RH(2002)Model-based clustering, discriminant analysis and density estimation Journal of the American Statistical Association 29 176-188