Research Priorities in Neurocritical Care

被引：0
作者：
R. G. Geocadin
T. P. Bleck
W. J. Koroshetz
C. S. Robertson
O. O. Zaidat
P. D. LeRoux
C. A. C. Wijman
J. I. Suarez
机构：
[1] Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine,Departments of Neurology, Anesthesiology
[2] Johns Hopkins Hospital,Critical Care Medicine and Neurosurgery
[3] Rush University Medical Center,Departments of Neurological Sciences, Neurosurgery, Medicine, and Anesthesiology
[4] National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke,Department of Neurological Surgery
[5] National Institutes of Health,Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery
[6] Baylor College of Medicine,Department of Neurosurgery
[7] Medical College of Wisconsin,Department of Neurology
[8] University of Pennsylvania,Department of Neurology
[9] Stanford University,undefined
[10] Baylor College of Medicine,undefined
来源：
Neurocritical Care | 2012年 / 16卷
关键词：
Neurocritical care; Critical care; Clinical trials; Research network; Consortium;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
This summary of the last session of the First Neurocritical Care Research Conference reviews the discussions about research priorities in neurocritical care. The first presentation reviewed current projects funded by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke at the National Institutes of Health and potential models to follow including an independent Neurocritical Care Network or the creation of such a network with the goal of collaborating with already existing ones. Experienced neurointensivists then presented their views on the most common and important research questions that need to be answered and investigated in the field. Finally, utility of clinical registries was discussed emphasizing their importance as hypothesis generators. During the group discussion, interests in comparative effectiveness research, the use of physiological endpoints from monitoring and alternate trial design were expressed.
引用
收藏
页码：35 / 41
页数：6
相关论文
共 91 条
[1]  
Colohan AR(1989)Head injury mortality in two centers with different emergency medical services and intensive care J Neurosurg 71 202-207
[2]  
Alves WM(1983)Comparison of outcome in two series of patients with severe head injuries J Neurosurg 59 745-750
[3]  
Gross CR(2011)Large between-center differences in outcome after moderate and severe traumatic brain injury in the IMPACT study Neurosurgery 68 601-607
[4]  
Torner JC(2010)Common data elements for traumatic brain injury: recommendations from the Interagency Working Group on Demographics and Clinical Assessment Arch Phys Med Rehabil 91 1641-1649
[5]  
Mehta VS(2006)The ability of paramedics to predict aspiration in patients undergoing prehospital rapid sequence intubation J Emerg Med 30 131-136
[6]  
Tandon PN(2005)Antibiotic prophylaxis of early onset pneumonia in critically ill comatose patients. A randomized study Intensive Care Med 31 510-516
[7]  
Jane JA(1997)Protective effect of intravenously administered cefuroxime against nosocomial pneumonia in patients with structural coma Am J Respir Crit Care Med 155 1729-1734
[8]  
Gelpke GJ(2001)Predictors of successful extubation in neurosurgical patients Am J Respir Crit Care Med 163 658-664
[9]  
Braakman R(2000)Implications of extubation delay in brain-injured patients meeting standard weaning criteria Am J Respir Crit Care Med 161 1530-1536
[10]  
Habbema JD(1998)Venous thromboembolism in the patient with acute traumatic brain injury: screening, diagnosis, prophylaxis, and treatment issues J Head Trauma Rehabil 13 36-50
12345678910