Quantifying and Exploring Strategic Regional Priorities for Managing Natural Capital and Ecosystem Services Given Multiple Stakeholder Perspectives

被引:0
作者
Brett A. Bryan
Agnès Grandgirard
John R. Ward
机构
[1] CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems,
[2] Cemagref,undefined
来源
Ecosystems | 2010年 / 13卷
关键词
multicriteria decision analysis; weighting; compositional analysis; planning; environmental management; multiple objective;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
A ubiquitous problem for community-based regional environmental agencies is to set strategic management priorities among a myriad of issues and multiple stakeholder perspectives. Here, we quantify the strategic management priorities for natural capital and ecosystem services using multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) in a case study of the South Australian Murray-Darling Basin Natural Resources Management Board (the Board) region. A natural capital and ecosystem services framework was tailored to present decision-makers with a range of potential issues for strategic consideration as goal hierarchies in MCDA. Priorities were elicited from the Board and its four regionally based consultative groups using the Analytical Hierarchy Process and swing weights. Centered log ratio transformed weights were analyzed using multiple pairwise ANOVA comparisons (Dunnett’s T3) and hierarchical cluster analysis. Substantial variation in priorities occurred between decision-makers. Nonetheless, analysis of priorities for assets and services robustly demonstrated that water was the highest priority, followed by land, then biota, with atmosphere the lowest priority. Decision-makers also considered that environmental management should not impact negatively on built or social capital. Few significant differences in priorities were found between decision-maker groups. However, clusters of manager types were found which represent distinct alternative management strategies, notably the prioritization of either intermediate or final ecosystem services. The results have implications for regional environmental decision-making and suggest that embracing variation in perspectives may be a better way forward for multistakeholder MCDA. The study operationalizes natural capital and ecosystem services by providing strategic priorities for targeting management and policy within the context of community-based, regional environmental management.
引用
收藏
页码:539 / 555
页数:16
相关论文
共 186 条
  • [1] Aitchison J(1982)The statistical analysis of compositional data (with discussion) J R Stat Soc Ser B (Stat Methodol) 44 139-177
  • [2] Aitchison J(2005)Compositional data analysis: where are we and where should we be heading? Math Geol 37 833-854
  • [3] Egozcue JJ(2008)Multi-attribute preference modeling and regional land-use planning Ecol Econ 65 325-335
  • [4] Ananda J(2003)The use of Analytic Hierarchy Process to incorporate stakeholder preferences into regional forest planning Forest Policy Econ 5 13-26
  • [5] Herath G(1950)A difficulty in the concept of social welfare J Polit Econ 58 328-346
  • [6] Ananda J(2005)The appropriateness of multicriteria analysis in environmental decision-making problems Environ Technol 26 951-962
  • [7] Herath G(2007)Improving petroleum contaminated land remediation decision-making through the MCA weighting process Chemosphere 66 791-798
  • [8] Arrow KJ(2007)What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units Ecol Econ 63 616-626
  • [9] Balasubramaniam A(2005)Communities in catchments: implications for natural resource management Geogr Res 43 286-296
  • [10] Voulvoulis N(2008)Systematic regional planning for multiple objective natural resource management J Environ Manage 88 1175-1189