Woody vegetation structure of xeric forest stands under different edaphic site conditions and disturbance histories in the Biosphere Reserve 'Parque Costero del Sur', Argentina

被引:0
作者
Alejandra María Ribichich
Jorge Protomastro
机构
[1] Universidad de Buenos Aires,Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales
[2] Ciudad Universitaria,undefined
[3] Museo de Ciencias Naturales de Salta,undefined
来源
Plant Ecology | 1998年 / 139卷
关键词
Forest conservation; Logging; Multivariate techniques; Old-growth forest; Soil properties; Stand structure;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We studied stand structures and soil properties in an old-growth forest and two 30-yr-old second-growth stands. In the old-growth forest, the total density and basal area average 1566 trees > 1.25 m height ha-1 and 46.73 m2 ha-1. The dominant trees are Scutia buxifolia and Celtis tala. Using multivariate techniques we distinguished three stands: PS1, dominated by S. buxifolia, is 1000 m far from the river. Its soil is shallow and loamy. PS2 and PS3, co-dominated by S. buxifolia and C. tala, are over 1200 m distant from the river. There the soil is deeper and has thicker texture and higher phosphorus and calcium concentrations than the near-the-river forest soil. Scutia buxifolia shows reverse J-shaped size-distributions and has morphological features of stress-tolerant species. Celtis tala shows oscillating decay size-curves that suggest recruitment pulses related to small gaps and it has morphological features of competitive species. Celtis tala was selectively cut in the past in the second-growth stands SNRD and SRD. The stand SNRD, 1000 m far from the river, is dominated by S. buxifolia. The second species is Schinus polygamus which presents the bell-shaped size-structure of the pioneer species. SNRD does not differ from its old-growth counterpart PS1 in total tree density, basal area and tree branching. The stand SRD, over 1200 m distant from the river, is co-dominated by S. buxifolia and by C. tala trees regenerated from stumps. SRD does not differ from its old-growth counterparts PS2 and PS3 in total tree density and basal area. As to tree branching, it does not differ from PS3, but differs from PS2. All the stands are being invaded by the exotic tree Ligustrum lucidum.
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 201
页数:12
相关论文
共 87 条
[1]  
Arturi M. F.(1997)Regeneración de Ecol. Austral 7 3-12
[2]  
Austin M. P.(1986) y su relación con el pastoreo, la cobertura herbácea y arbórea en el NE de la provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina Trend Ecol. Evolut. 1 161-164
[3]  
Bonnicksen T. M.(1981)The theoretical basis of vegetation science Forest Ecol. Manage. 3 307-328
[4]  
Stone E. C.(1949)The giant sequoia-mixed conifer forest community characterized through pattern analysis as a mosaic of aggregations Lilloa 20 269-347
[5]  
Cabrera A. L.(1993)Las comunidades vegetales de los alrededores de La Plata (Provincia de Buenos Aires, Rep. Argentina) Parodiana 8 101-112
[6]  
Cagnoni M.(1995)La vegetación de la Reserva de Vida Silvestre Campos del TuyÚ Contr. Cient. Soc. Argentina Estudios Geográficos 1995 21-28
[7]  
Faggi A.(1996)Carta de vegetación de la Reserva 'El Destino' (Pcia. Buenos Aires, Argentina) Parodiana 9 25-44
[8]  
Cagnoni M.(1993)La vegetación de la Reserva 'El Destino' (Partido de Magdalena, Provincia de Buenos Aires) Parodiana 8 227-263
[9]  
Faggi A.(1976)Las comunidades vegetales de la Reserva Natural Estricta Otamendi IDIA suplemento diciembre 1976 119-122
[10]  
Ribichich A. M.(1989)Método de determinación rápida de nitrógeno de suelo Environ. Manage. 13 593-601