Comparison of novel xenograft (bovine fetal growth plate) and allograft effects on experimental bone defect healing in rabbit

被引:0
作者
Bigham A.S. [1 ]
Dehghani S.N. [2 ]
Shafiei Z. [2 ]
Torabinezhad S. [3 ]
机构
[1] Department of Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord
[2] Department of Surgery, School of Veterinary Medicine, Shiraz University, Shiraz
[3] Department of Pathology, Shiraz University of Medical Science, Shiraz
关键词
Allograft; Bone healing; Bovine fetal growth plate; Rabbit; Xenograft;
D O I
10.1007/s00580-009-0819-6
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Large bone defects resulting from trauma, tumors, osteitis, implant loosening, or corrective osteotomies require surgical therapy because spontaneous regeneration is limited to relatively small defects. Currently, transplantation of autografts or allografts, mineral bone substitutes, and callus distraction are the most commonly used techniques for skeletal reconstruction. Each method has significant limitations, e.g., availability and biological or biomechanical reasons. This study was designed to evaluate allograft and new xenograft (bovine fetal growth plate) effects on the bone healing process. Twenty male New Zealand White rabbits were used in this study. In the allograft group, the defect was filled by fresh allogeneic cortical graft; in the xenograft group, the defect was filled by a segment of bovine fetal growth plate and was fixed by cerclage wire. Radiological, histopathological, and biomechanical evaluations were performed and results were scored and analyzed statistically. Statistical tests did not support significant differences between the two groups radiographically at the 14th postoperative day (P > 0.05). There was a significant difference in bone formation at the 28th, 42nd, and 56th postoperative days. There were significant radiological differences for bone union and remodeling by the 42nd day postoperatively (P < 0.05). The xenograft was superior to the allograft by the 56th postoperative day for radiological bone formation (P < 0.03); histopathological and biomechanical evaluation revealed no significant differences between the two groups. It can be concluded that the superior bone healing process in the xenograft group was due to the presence of some osteoinduction proteins in bovine fetal growth plate. © Springer-Verlag London Limited 2009.
引用
收藏
页码:345 / 351
页数:6
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
Albrek T., Johansson C., Osteoinduction, osteoconduction and osteointegration, Eur Spine J, 10, (2001)
[2]  
Alexander J.W., Leonard's Orthopedic Surgery of the Dog and Cat, pp. 43-48, (1985)
[3]  
Alexander J.W., Bone grafting, Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract, 17, pp. 811-819, (1987)
[4]  
An Y.H., Friedman R.J., Animal Models in Orthopedic Research, pp. 204-205, (1999)
[5]  
Anderson H.C., Hodges P.T., Aguilera X.M., Missana L., Moylan P.E., Bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) localization in developing human and rat growth plate, metaphysis, epiphysis, and articular cartilage, J Histochem Cytochem, 48, pp. 1493-1502, (2000)
[6]  
Arrington E.D., Smith W.J., Chambers H.G., Bucknell A.L., Davino N.A., Complications of iliac crest bone graft harvesting, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 329, pp. 300-309, (1996)
[7]  
Bauer T.W., Muschler G.F., Bone graft materials: An overview of basic science, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 371, pp. 10-27, (2000)
[8]  
Bolander M.E., Galian G., The use of demineralize bone matrix in the repair of segmental defect, J Bone Jt Surg, 68 A, pp. 1264-1274, (1983)
[9]  
Bostrom M.P., Yang X., Kennan M., Sandhu H., Dicarlo E., Lane J.M., An unexpected outcome during testing of commercially available demineralized bone graft materials: How safe are the nonallograft components, Spine, 26, pp. 1425-1428, (2001)
[10]  
Brinker W.O., Piermattei D.L., Flo G.L., Bone Grafting. Small Animal Orthopedics and Fracture Repair, pp. 147-153, (1997)