Laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy and myomectomy for uterine prolapse: A case report and review of the literature

被引:6
作者
Faraj R. [1 ]
Broome J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Bolton Hospital, Farnworth, BL4 0JR, Minerva Road
[2] Urogynaecology Department, Royal Bolton Hospital, Farnworth, BL4 0JR, Minerva Road
关键词
Tolterodine; Vaginal Hysterectomy; Uterine Fibroid; Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification; Pelvic Floor Muscle Training;
D O I
10.1186/1752-1947-3-99
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction. A large number of hysterectomies are carried out for uterine prolapse, menorrhagia and other symptomatic but benign gynaecological conditions, which has increased interest in new approaches to treat these disorders. These new procedures are less invasive and offer reduced risk and faster recovery. Case presentation. Sacrohysteropexy can be carried out instead of vaginal hysterectomy in the treatment of uterine prolapse. It involves using a synthetic mesh to suspend the uterus to the sacrum; this maintains durable anatomic restoration, normal vaginal axis and sexual function. A laparoscopic approach has major advantages over the abdominal route including shorter recovery time and less adhesion formation. We describe a laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy in a 55-year-old Caucasian British woman that was technically difficult. An intramural uterine fibroid was encroaching just above the uterosacral ligament making mesh positioning impossible. This was removed and the procedure completed successfully. Conclusion. Posterior wall fibroid is not a contraindication for laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy. This procedure has increasingly become an effective treatment of uterine prolapse in women who have no indication for hysterectomy. © 2009 Faraj and Broome; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]  
Crafoord K., Sydsjo A., Nilsson K., Kjolhede P., Primary surgery of genital prolapse: A shift in treatment tradition, Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 85, 9, pp. 1104-1108, (2006)
[2]  
Nichols D.H., Surgery for pelvic disorders, Surg Clin North Am, 71, 5, pp. 927-946, (1991)
[3]  
Maher C.F., Carey M.P., Murray C.J., Laparoscopic suture hysteropexy for uterine prolapse, Obstet Gynecol, 97, pp. 1010-1014, (2001)
[4]  
Cutner A., Kearney R., Vashisht A., Laparoscopic uterine sling suspension: A new technique of uterine suspension in women desiring surgical management of uterine prolapse with uterine conservation, BJOG, 114, 9, pp. 1159-1162, (2007)
[5]  
Altman D., Vayrynen T., Engh M.E., Axelsen S., Falconer C., Nordic Transvaginal Mesh Group: Short-term outcome after transvaginal mesh repair of pelvic organ prolapse, Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct, 19, pp. 789-793, (2008)
[6]  
Barranger E., Fritel X., Pigne A., Abdominal sacrohysteropexy in young women with uterovaginal prolapse: Long-term follow-up, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 189, 5, pp. 1245-1250, (2003)
[7]  
Demirci F., Ozdemir I., Somunkiran A., Doyran G.D., Alhan A., Gul B., Abdominal sacrohysteropexy in young women with uterovaginal prolapse: Results of 20 cases, J Reprod Med, 51, 7, pp. 539-543, (2006)
[8]  
Leron E., Stanton S.L., Sacrohysteropexy with synthetic mesh for the management of uterovaginal prolapse, BJOG, 108, 6, pp. 629-633, (2001)
[9]  
Rosenblatt P.L., Chelmow D., Ferzandi T.R., Laparoscopic sacrocervicopexy for the treatment of uterine prolapse: A retrospective case series report, J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 15, 3, pp. 268-272, (2008)