Preprocedural magnetic resonance imaging for image-guided catheter ablation of scar-related ventricular tachycardia

被引:0
作者
Qian Tao
Sebastiaan R. D. Piers
Hildo J. Lamb
Katja Zeppenfeld
Rob J. van der Geest
机构
[1] Leiden University Medical Center,Division of Image Processing (LKEB), Department of Radiology
[2] Leiden University Medical Center,Department of Cardiology
[3] Leiden University Medical Center,Department of Radiology
来源
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging | 2015年 / 31卷
关键词
Magnetic resonance imaging; Catheter ablation; Ventricular tachycardia; Myocardial scar; Image integration;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
To present and validate a highly automated MRI analysis workflow for image-guided catheter ablation of scar-related ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation procedures. A cohort of 15 post-infarction patients underwent MRI prior to VT ablation. The MRI study included a black-blood turbo spin echo sequence for visualizing the aortic root and ostium of the left main (LM) coronary artery, and a 3D late gadolinium enhanced sequence for visualizing the LV anatomy and myocardial scar substrate. Semi-automated segmentation of the LV, aortic root and ostium of LM was performed, followed by fully automated segmentation of myocardial scar. All segmented structures were aligned using an automated image registration algorithm to remove inter-scan displacement. MRI was integrated at the beginning of the procedure after mapping a single LM point. The integration performance was compared to that of the traditional iterative closest point (ICP) method. The proposed method required a single LM mapping point only, compared to 255 ± 43 points with the ICP method. The single-point method achieved a mean point-to-surface distance of 4.9 ± 1.5 mm on the LV surface and 5.1 ± 1.7 mm on the aorta surface (ICP: 3.7 ± 0.8 and 9.2 ± 7.2 mm, P < 0.05). The Cohen’s kappa coefficient between the MRI-defined and EAM-defined scar was 0.36 ± 0.16 for the presented method, significantly higher than that of ICP method (0.23 ± 0.21, P = 0.03), indicating more accurate scar substrate localization during integration. This study demonstrated the feasibility of preprocedural MRI integration into the VT ablation procedure, with highly automated image analysis workflow and minimal mapping effort.
引用
收藏
页码:369 / 377
页数:8
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]  
De Bakker JM(1993)Slow conduction in the infarcted human heart. “Zigzag” course of activation Circulation 88 915-926
[2]  
van Capelle FJ(2007)Catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia Circulation 115 2750-2760
[3]  
Janse MJ(2012)Epicardial substrate mapping for ventricular tachycardia ablation in patients with non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy: a new algorithm to differentiate between scar and viable myocardium developed by simultaneous integration of computed tomography and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging Eur Heart J 98 2334-2351
[4]  
Stevenson WG(1998)Sudden cardiac death Circulation 118 2773-2782
[5]  
Soejima K(2008)Irrigated radiofrequency catheter ablation guided by electroanatomic mapping for recurrent ventricular tachycardia after myocardial infarction: the multicenter thermocool ventricular tachycardia ablation trial Circulation 343 1445-1453
[6]  
Piers SRD(2000)The use of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to identify reversible myocardial dysfunction N Engl J Med 44 2202-2213
[7]  
Van H van Taxis CFB(2004)Integration of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging with three-dimensional electroanatomic mapping to guide left ventricular catheter manipulation: feasibility in a porcine model of healed myocardial infarction J Am Coll Cardiol 52 839-842
[8]  
Tao Q(2008)Electroanatomic characterization of post-infarct scars: comparison with 3-dimensional myocardial scar reconstruction based on magnetic resonance imaging J Am Coll Cardiol 10 1109-1116
[9]  
Zipes DP(2013)Feasibility of image-based simulation to estimate ablation target in human ventricular arrhythmia Heart Rhythm 101 939-947
[10]  
Wellens HJ(2007)Magnetic resonance based anatomical analysis of scar-related ventricular tachycardia: implications for catheter ablation Circ Res 53 1138-1145