Genomic basis determining root system architecture in maize

被引:5
作者
Li, Pengcheng [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Zhihai [1 ]
Xiao, Gui [1 ]
Zhao, Zheng [1 ]
He, Kunhui [1 ]
Yang, Xiaohong [5 ]
Pan, Qingchun [1 ,3 ]
Mi, Guohua [1 ,3 ]
Jia, Zhongtao [1 ,3 ]
Yan, Jianbing [4 ]
Chen, Fanjun [1 ,3 ]
Yuan, Lixing [1 ,3 ,6 ]
机构
[1] China Agr Univ, Natl Acad Agr Green Dev, Coll Resources & Environm Sci, State Key Lab Nutrient Use & Management, Beijing 100193, Peoples R China
[2] Yangzhou Univ, Jiangsu Key Lab Crop Genet & Physiol, Coinnovat Ctr Modern Prod Technol Grain Crops, Key Lab Plant Funct Genom,Minist Educ, Yangzhou 225009, Peoples R China
[3] China Agr Univ, Coll Resources & Environm Sci, Key Lab Plant Soil Interact,MOE, Ctr Resources Environm & Food Secur, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Huazhong Agr Univ, Natl Key Lab Crop Genet Improvement, Wuhan 430070, Peoples R China
[5] China Agr Univ, Natl Maize Improvement Ctr China, Beijing Key Lab Crop Genet Improvement, Beijing 100193, Peoples R China
[6] China Agr Univ, Ctr Crop Funct Genom & Mol Breeding, Beijing 100193, Peoples R China
关键词
ZEA-MAYS L; GENETIC ARCHITECTURE; PHENOTYPIC VARIATION; WIDE ASSOCIATION; GRAIN-YIELD; ANATOMICAL PHENES; DROUGHT TOLERANCE; LATERAL ROOTS; TRAITS; FIELD;
D O I
10.1007/s00122-024-04606-z
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Key messageA total of 389 and 344 QTLs were identified by GWAS and QTL mapping explaining accumulatively 32.2-65.0% and 23.7-63.4% of phenotypic variation for 14 shoot-borne root traits using more than 1300 individuals across multiple field trails.AbstractEfficient nutrient and water acquisition from soils depends on the root system architecture (RSA). However, the genetic determinants underlying RSA in maize remain largely unexplored. In this study, we conducted a comprehensive genetic analysis for 14 shoot-borne root traits using 513 inbred lines and 800 individuals from four recombinant inbred line (RIL) populations at the mature stage across multiple field trails. Our analysis revealed substantial phenotypic variation for these 14 root traits, with a total of 389 and 344 QTLs identified through genome-wide association analysis (GWAS) and linkage analysis, respectively. These QTLs collectively explained 32.2-65.0% and 23.7-63.4% of the trait variation within each population. Several a priori candidate genes involved in auxin and cytokinin signaling pathways, such as IAA26, ARF2, LBD37 and CKX3, were found to co-localize with these loci. In addition, a total of 69 transcription factors (TFs) from 27 TF families (MYB, NAC, bZIP, bHLH and WRKY) were found for shoot-borne root traits. A total of 19 genes including PIN3, LBD15, IAA32, IAA38 and ARR12 and 19 GWAS signals were overlapped with selective sweeps. Further, significant additive effects were found for root traits, and pyramiding the favorable alleles could enhance maize root development. These findings could contribute to understand the genetic basis of root development and evolution, and provided an important genetic resource for the genetic improvement of root traits in maize.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 94 条
[91]   CHX14 is a plasma membrane K-efflux transporter that regulates K+ redistribution in Arabidopsis thaliana [J].
Zhao, Jian ;
Li, Penghui ;
Motes, Christy M. ;
Park, Sunghun ;
Hirschi, Kendal D. .
PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT, 2015, 38 (11) :2223-2238
[92]   The WUSCHEL-Related Homeobox Gene WOX11 Is Required to Activate Shoot-Borne Crown Root Development in Rice [J].
Zhao, Yu ;
Hu, Yongfeng ;
Dai, Mingqiu ;
Huang, Limin ;
Zhou, Dao-Xiu .
PLANT CELL, 2009, 21 (03) :736-748
[93]   Shared Genetic Control of Root System Architecture between Zea mays and Sorghum bicolor [J].
Zheng, Zihao ;
Hey, Stefan ;
Jubery, Talukder ;
Liu, Huyu ;
Yang, Yu ;
Coffey, Lisa ;
Miao, Chenyong ;
Sigmon, Brandi ;
Schnable, James C. ;
Hochholdinger, Frank ;
Ganapathysubramanian, Baskar ;
Schnable, Patrick S. .
PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 2020, 182 (02) :977-991
[94]   From lab to field, new approaches to phenotyping root system architecture [J].
Zhu, Jinming ;
Ingram, Paul A. ;
Benfey, Philip N. ;
Elich, Tedd .
CURRENT OPINION IN PLANT BIOLOGY, 2011, 14 (03) :310-317