Tips for Teachers of Evidence-based Medicine: Making Sense of Diagnostic Test Results Using Likelihood Ratios

被引：0

作者：

W. Scott Richardson

Mark C. Wilson

Sheri A. Keitz

Peter C. Wyer

机构：

[1] Wright State University and the Three Owl Learning Institute,Boonshoft School of Medicine

[2] University of Iowa,Carver College of Medicine

[3] Miami Veterans Affairs Medical Center,undefined

[4] University of Miami Miller School of Medicine,undefined

[5] Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons,undefined

来源：

Journal of General Internal Medicine | 2008年 / 23卷

关键词：

evidence-based medicine; likelihood ratios; clinical education;

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

引用

页码：87 / 92

页数：5

共 37 条

[1]

Bossuyt PM(2003)for the STARD Group Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD initiative Ann Intern Med 138 40-44

[2]

Reitsma JB(1994)Guidelines for meta-analyses evaluating diagnostic tests Ann Intern Med 120 667-676

[3]

Bruns DE(1997)Evidence-based diagnosis: more is needed Evid-Based Med 2 70-71

[4]

Gatsonis CA(1989)Diagnostic reasoning Ann Intern Med 110 893-900

[5]

Glasziou PP(2007)We should overcome the barriers to evidence-based clinical diagnosis J Clin Epi 60 217-227

[6]

Irwig LM(1998)Academic calculations versus clinical judgments: Practicing physicians’ use of quantitative measures of test accuracy Am J Med 104 374-380

[7]

Irwig L(2002)Simplifying likelihood ratios J Gen Intern Med 17 646-649

[8]

Tosteson ANA(2003)Interval likelihood ratios Ann Emerg Med 42 292-297

[9]

Gatsonis C(2004)Statistics Notes: Diagnostic tests 4: Likelihood ratios BMJ 329 168-169

[10]

Richardson WS(2005)Refining clinical diagnosis with likelihood ratios Lancet 365 1500-1505

← 1 2 3 4 →