‘It's Demand, Stupid’: The Failure and Future of Integrating Climate Change Concerns into UK Transport Policy

被引:0
作者
Tim Rayner
Duncan Russel
Irene Lorenzoni
机构
[1] Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research. ZICER,
[2] School of Environmental Sciences University of East Anglia,undefined
[3] Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment,undefined
[4] School of Environmental Sciences,undefined
[5] University of East Anglia,undefined
来源
British Politics | 2008年 / 3卷
关键词
climate change; transport policy; new labour;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Since 1997, successive Labour Governments have prioritised action on climate change. The United Kingdom is commonly perceived to be an international leader in terms of its global diplomatic efforts and, to a lesser extent, its domestic policy response. However, the UK's carbon dioxide emissions from the transport and housing sectors are increasing. In this paper, we focus on the transport sector and examine the extent to which policies have encouraged decarbonisation, and the underlying reasons behind their relative success or failure. Despite initial good intentions, policies aimed at improved efficiency, encouragement of less polluting modes of transport and reductions in demand have fallen short. Underlying this failure, we argue that the transport sector's traditional prioritising of the immediate economic implications of policy and the government's fear of being seen to impinge upon personal mobility have resulted in too strong a reliance on technological solutions rather than measures that seek to curb demand through behavioural change. We conclude by arguing that unless demand for carbon intensive forms of transport is reduced, the government will struggle to meet its increasingly ambitious carbon dioxide reduction targets, but that important new legislative initiatives at national and EU level offer chances for a more concerted approach.
引用
收藏
页码:373 / 389
页数:16
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
Bows A(2007)Policy clash: can projected aviation growth be reconciled with the UK Government's 60% carbon-reduction target? Transport Policy 14 103-110
[2]  
Anderson K(2006)Pledges, politics and performance: an assessment of UK climate policy Climate Policy 6 257-274
[3]  
Darkin B(2002)Decarbonising the UK: a ‘radical agenda' from the Cabinet Office Political Quarterly 73 344-352
[4]  
Jordan A(2007)Is there now a political climate for policy change? Policy and politics after the Stern Review Political Quarterly 78 310-319
[5]  
Jordan A(2004)Climate change science: adapt, mitigate, or ignore? Science 303 176-177
[6]  
Lorenzoni I(2007)Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications Global Environmental Change 17 445-459
[7]  
King DA(1995)From ‘predict and provide’ to ‘predict and prevent’: pricing and planning in transport policy Transport Policy 2 43-49
[8]  
Lorenzoni I(2008)Daylight falls on the shadow price of carbon ENDS Report 396 30-33
[9]  
Nicholson-Cole S(2002)Transport user needs and marketing public transport Municipal Engineer 151 23-28
[10]  
Whitmarsh L(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined