Perceptions and tolerance of uncertainty: relationship to trust in COVID-19 health information and vaccine hesitancy

被引:0
作者
Arielle S. Gillman
Liz Scharnetzki
Patrick Boyd
Rebecca A. Ferrer
William M. P. Klein
Paul K. J. Han
机构
[1] National Cancer Institute,Behavioral Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences
[2] Maine Medical Center Research Institute,Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation
来源
Journal of Behavioral Medicine | 2023年 / 46卷
关键词
Uncertainty; Uncertainty tolerance; COVID-19; Vaccine hesitancy; Trust; Ambiguity;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The COVID-19 crisis has exposed the public to considerable scientific uncertainty, which may promote vaccine hesitancy among individuals with lower tolerance of uncertainty. In a national sample of US adults in May–June 2020, we examined how both perceptions of uncertainty about COVID-19 and trait-level differences in tolerance of uncertainty arising from various sources (risk, ambiguity, and complexity) are related to vaccine hesitancy-related outcomes, including trust in COVID-19 information, COVID-19 vaccine intentions, and beliefs that COVID-19 vaccines should undergo a longer testing period before being released to the public. Overall, perceptions of COVID-19 uncertainty were not associated with trust in information, vaccine intentions, or beliefs about vaccine testing. However, higher tolerance of risk was associated with lower intentions to get vaccinated, and lower tolerance of ambiguity was associated with lower intentions to get vaccinated and preferring a longer period of vaccine testing. Critically, perceptions of COVID-19 uncertainty and trait-level tolerance for uncertainty also interacted as predicted, such that greater perceived COVID-19 uncertainty was more negatively associated with trust in COVID-19 information among individuals with lower tolerance for risk and ambiguity. Thus, although perceptions of uncertainty regarding COVID-19 may not reduce trust and vaccine hesitancy for all individuals, trait-level tolerance of uncertainty arising from various sources may have both direct and moderating effects on these outcomes. These findings can inform public health communication or other interventions to increase COVID-19 vaccination uptake.
引用
收藏
页码:40 / 53
页数:13
相关论文
共 136 条
  • [1] Benin AL(2006)Qualitative analysis of mothers’ decision-making about vaccines for infants: The importance of trust Pediatrics 117 1532-1541
  • [2] Wisler-Scher DJ(2016)Unknown risks: Parental hesitation about vaccination Medical Decision Making 36 479-489
  • [3] Colson E(1961)Risk, ambiguity, and the Savage axioms The Quarterly Journal of Economics 75 643-669
  • [4] Shapiro ED(2017)Vaccine hesitancy and trust Ethical Aspects of Risk Communication 46 182-188
  • [5] Holmboe ES(1990)Tolerance for ambiguity among medical students: Implications for their selection, training and practice Social Science & Medicine 31 619-624
  • [6] Blaisdell LL(2020)A review of the effects of uncertainty in public science communication Public Understanding of Science 29 614-633
  • [7] Gutheil C(2011)Varieties of uncertainty in health care: a conceptual taxonomy Medical Decision Making 31 828-838
  • [8] Hootsmans NAM(2006)Perceived ambiguity about cancer prevention recommendations: relationship to perceptions of cancer preventability, risk, and worry Journal of Health Communication 11 51-69
  • [9] Han PKJ(2009)Aversion to ambiguity regarding medical tests and treatments: Measurement, prevalence, and relationship to sociodemographic factors Journal of Health Communication 14 556-572
  • [10] Ellsberg D(2021)communicating scientific uncertainty about the COVID-19 pandemic: Online experimental study of an uncertainty-normalizing strategy Journal of Medical Internet Research 23 e27832-444