Healthcare reform in the United States and China: Pharmaceutical market implications

被引:11
作者
Daemmrich A. [1 ]
Mohanty A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Department of History and Philosophy of Science, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City
[2] Life Sciences Consulting, Nariman Point, Mumbai
关键词
Affordable care act; Drug prices; Health insurance; Health policy; Healthcare system; Pharmaceutical industry;
D O I
10.1186/2052-3211-7-9
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: The United States and China are broadening health insurance coverage and increasing spending on pharmaceuticals, in contrast to other major economies that are reducing health spending and implementing a variety of drug price controls. This article analyzes the implications of health system reforms in the United States and China for national pharmaceutical markets. It follows a historical institutionalist approach that identifies path dependency in the design and operation of national health systems. On that basis, we estimate prescription sales for 2015 and 2020, analyze the sustainability of free-market pricing for drugs in the two countries, and assess future competitive dynamics in the pharmaceutical sector. Methods: The institutional trajectories of health system reform and insurance coverage were studied for the United States and China. Next, data were collected from government, industry, and analyst reports on total healthcare spending and prescription drug expenditure by insurance status (in the United States) and by site of care (in China). Simple quantitative models were developed to estimate future drug spending based on insurance coverage, treatment locations, and health spending as a percentage of GDP. Results: Both countries will see rising total pharmaceutical spending and will be the two largest country markets for prescription drugs through at least 2020. In dollar terms, the U.S. pharmaceutical market will be over $440 billion in 2015 and $700 billion in 2020; China’s prescription market will be over $155 billion in 2015 and grow further to $260 billion in 2020. In both countries, generics will increase their share of all prescriptions, but economic and structural incentives for new drug invention and brand-name prescribing by physicians will keep the share of patented drug sales high compared to countries with more direct government control over the pharmaceutical market. Conclusions: Expanding private insurance contributes to spending on branded drugs, since insurers compete for market share rather than cost savings. Health system reforms presently being enacted in the United States and China align to historical institutional trajectories in each country, but leave unresolved a core tension between incentives for new drug invention and universal access to affordable medicines. © 2014 Daemmrich and Mohanty; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:2 / 13
页数:11
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
Hoebert J.M., Van Dijk L., Mantel-Teeuwisse A.K., Leufkens H.G., Laing R.O., National medicines policies–a review of the evolution and development processes, J Pharm Pol Pract, 6, (2013)
[2]  
Starr P., Remedy and Reaction: The Peculiar American Struggle over Health Care Reform, (2011)
[3]  
Daemmrich A., The political economy of healthcare reform in China: Negotiating public and private, Springerplus, 2, (2013)
[4]  
Ragin C.C., Rubinson C., The distinctiveness of comparative research, The Sage Handbook of Comparative Politics, pp. 13-34, (2009)
[5]  
Pierson P., Skocpol T., Historical institutionalism in contemporary political science, Political Science: The State of the Discipline, pp. 693-721, (2002)
[6]  
Starr P., The Social Transformation of American Medicine, (1982)
[7]  
Berkowitz E., Medicare and Medicaid: The Past as Prologue, Health Care Financ Rev, 29, pp. 81-93, (2008)
[8]  
Oliver T.R., Lee P.R., Lipton H.L., A political history of medicare and prescription drug coverage, Milbank Quart, 82, pp. 283-354, (2004)
[9]  
Pharmaceutical Industry Profile 2012, (2012)
[10]  
Congress U.S., Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, (2010)