Off-pump or on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting—a dilemma in elderly

Background: Off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery (OPCAB) has been performed for many years, but its use is increasing in frequency, and it remains an open question whether OPCAB is associated with better outcomes than on-pump coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery especially in patients with age >65 years. Methods: We randomly assigned patients 65 years of age or older who were scheduled for elective first-time CABG to undergo the procedure either without cardiopulmonary bypass (off-pump CABG) or with it (on-pump CABG). The primary end point was a composite of death, stroke, myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, or new renal-replacement therapy at 30 days and at 12 months after surgery. Results: A total of 581 patients underwent randomization. At 30 days after surgery, there was no significant difference between patients who underwent off-pump surgery and those who underwent on-pump surgery in terms of the composite outcome (9.8 vs. 10.1 %; odds ratio, 0.98; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.57 to 1.68; P = 0.95) or four of the components (death, stroke, myocardial infarction, or new renal-replacement therapy). Repeat revascularization occurred more frequently after off-pump CABG than after on-pump CABG (1.5 vs. 0.3 %; odds ratio, 3.93; 95 % CI, 0.43 to 35.39; P = 0.22). At 12 months, there was no significant between-group difference in the composite end point (13.1 vs. 13.3 %; hazard ratio, 0.98; 95 % CI, 0.60 to 1.58; P = 0.94) or in any of the individual components. Conclusions: In patients 65 years of age or older, there was no significant difference between on-pump and off-pump CABG with regard to the composite outcome of death, stroke, myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, or new renal-replacement therapy within 30 days and within 12 months after surgery. © 2016, Indian Association of Cardiovascular-Thoracic Surgeons.