Impact of assimilation of conventional and satellite meteorological observations on the numerical simulation of a Bay of Bengal Tropical Cyclone of November 2008 near Tamilnadu using WRF model

被引:0
作者
C. V. Srinivas
V. Yesubabu
R. Venkatesan
S. S. V. S. Ramarkrishna
机构
[1] Safety Group,Department of Meteorology and Oceanography
[2] Indira Gandhi Centre for Atomic Research,undefined
[3] Andhra University,undefined
来源
Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics | 2010年 / 110卷
关键词
Cyclone; Tropical Cyclone; India Meteorological Department; Global Forecast System; Assimilation Experiment;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The objective of this study is to examine the impact of assimilation of conventional and satellite data on the prediction of a severe cyclonic storm that formed in the Bay of Bengal during November 2008 with the four-dimensional data assimilation (FDDA) technique. The Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF ARW) model was used to study the structure, evolution, and intensification of the storm. Five sets of numerical simulations were performed using the WRF. In the first one, called Control run, the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) Final Analysis (FNL) was used for the initial and boundary conditions. In the remaining experiments available observations were used to obtain an improved analysis and FDDA grid nudging was performed for a pre-forecast period of 24 h. The second simulation (FDDAALL) was performed with all the data of the Quick Scatterometer (QSCAT), Special Sensor Microwave Imager (SSM/I) winds, conventional surface, and upper air meteorological observations. QSCAT wind alone was used in the third simulation (FDDAQSCAT), the SSM/I wind alone in the fourth (FDDASSMI) and the conventional observations alone in the fifth (FDDAAWS). The FDDAALL with assimilation of all observations, produced sea level pressure pattern closely agreeing with the analysis. Examination of various parameters indicated that the Control run over predicted the intensity of the storm with large error in its track and landfall position. The assimilation experiment with QSCAT winds performed marginally better than the one with SSM/I winds due to better representation of surface wind vectors. The FDDAALL outperformed all the simulations for the intensity, movement, and rainfall associated with the storm. Results suggest that the combination of land-based surface, upper air observations along with satellite winds for assimilation produced better prediction than the assimilation with individual data sets.
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 44
页数:25
相关论文
共 139 条
  • [1] Aberson SD(2001)The ensemble of tropical cyclone track forecasting models in the north 986 Atlantic basin (1976–2000) Bull Amer Meteor Soc 82 1895-1904
  • [2] Anthes RA(1977)Hurricane model experiments with a new cumulus parameterization scheme Mon Weather Rev 105 287-300
  • [3] Bhaskar Rao DV(2006)Numerical prediction of the Orissa super-cyclone (2006): sensitivity to the parameterization of convection, boundary layer and explicit moisture processes Mausam 57 61-78
  • [4] Hari Prasad D(2007)Sensitivity of tropical cyclone intensification to boundary layer and convective processes Nat Hazards 41 429-445
  • [5] Bhaskar Rao DV(2009)Impact of horizontal resolution and the advantages of the nested domains approach in the prediction of tropical cyclone intensification and movement J Geophys Res 114 D11106-1592
  • [6] Hari Prasad D(2002)A cloud-resolving simulation of hurricane Bob (1991): storm structure 997 and eyewall buoyancy Mon Weather Rev 130 1573-3961
  • [7] Bhaskar Rao DV(2000)Sensitivity of high resolution simulations of hurricane Bob (1991) to planetary boundary layer parameterizations Mon Weather Rev 128 3941-1881
  • [8] Hari Prasad D(2001)Numerical simulations of the genesis of hurricane Diana (1984). Part I. Control Simulation Mon Weather Rev 129 1859-3107
  • [9] Srinivas D(1989)Numerical study of convection observed during winter monsoon experiment using a mesoscale two-dimensional model J Atmos Sci 46 3077-4138
  • [10] Braun SA(2000)Consensus over of dynamical tropical cyclone track forecasts errors versus spread Mon Weather Rev 128 4131-700