Acidogenic sludge fermentation to recover soluble organics as the carbon source for denitrification in wastewater treatment: Comparison of sludge types

被引:0
作者
Lin Lin
Ying-yu Li
Xiao-yan Li
机构
[1] The University of Hong Kong,Environmental Engineering Research Centre, Department of Civil Engineering
[2] Tsinghua University,Shenzhen Engineering Research Laboratory for Sludge and FoodWaste Treatment and Resource Recovery, Graduate School at Shenzhen
来源
Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering | 2018年 / 12卷
关键词
Sewage sludge; Chemically enhanced primary sedimentation (CEPS); Acidogenic fermentation; Organic carbon recovery; Nitrogen removal;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
For biological nitrogen (N) removal from wastewater, a sufficient organic carbon source is requested for denitrification. However, the organic carbon/nitrogen ratio in municipal wastewater is becoming lower in recent years, which increases the demand for the addition of external organic carbon, e.g. methanol, in wastewater treatment. The volatile fatty acids (VFAs) produced by acidogenic fermentation of sewage sludge can be an attractive alternative for methanol. Chemically enhanced primary sedimentation (CEPS) is an effective process that applies chemical coagulants to enhance the removal of organic pollutants and phosphorus from wastewater by sedimentation. In terms of the chemical and biological characteristics, the CEPS sludge is considerably different from the conventional primary and secondary sludge. In the present study, FeCl3 and PACl (polyaluminum chloride) were used as the coagulants for CEPS treatment of raw sewage. The derived CEPS sludge (Fe-sludge and Al-sludge) was then processed with mesophilic acidogenic fermentation to hydrolyse the solid organics and produce VFAs for organic carbon recovery, and the sludge acidogenesis efficiency was compared with that of the conventional primary sludge and secondary sludge. The results showed that the Fe-sludge exhibited the highest hydrolysis and acidogenesis efficiency, while the Al-sludge and secondary sludge had lower hydrolysis efficiency than that of primary sludge. Utilizing the Fe-sludge fermentation liquid as the carbon source for denitrification, more than 99% of nitrate removal was achieved in the main-stream wastewater treatment without any external carbon addition, instead of 35% obtained from the conventional process of primary sedimentation followed by the oxic/anoxic (O/A) treatment. [graphic not available: see fulltext]
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]  
Andreasen K.(1997)Reduction of nutrient emission by sludge hydrolysis Water Sci Technol 35 79-85
[2]  
Petersen G.(2006)Effect of pyrolysis temperature and time on catalytic performance of sewage sludge/industrial sludge-based composite adsorbents Appl Catal B 67 77-85
[3]  
Thomsen H.(2008)Hydrolytic enzymes in sewage sludge treatment: A mini-review Water SA 34 343-350
[4]  
Strube R.(2007)Hydrolysis and acidification of waste activated sludge at different pHs Water Res 41 683-689
[5]  
Bandosz T. J.(2008)Comparison of operating issues and dosing requirements for alternative carbon sources in denitrification filters Proc Water Environ Fed 9 6603-6617
[6]  
Block K.(1982)Effect of chemical coagulation on anaerobic digestibility of organic materials Water Res 16 707-718
[7]  
Burgess J. E.(2006)The effect of temperature and carbon source on denitrification using volatile fatty acids Biochem Eng J 28 148-155
[8]  
Pletschke B. I.(2004)Use of volatile fatty acids from an acid-phase digester for denitrification J Biotechnol 114 289-297
[9]  
Chen Y.(2011)Operation of four denitrification plants in the Florida Keys to meet Florida Chapter 99395: Comparative data from the use of alternative carbon sources in sequencing batch reactors Proc Water Environ Fed 1 376-393
[10]  
Jiang S.(2017)Recovery of organic carbon and phosphorus from wastewater by Fe-enhanced primary sedimentation and sludge fermentation Process Biochem 54 135-139