Solvency Assessment for Insurance Groups in the United States and Europe-A Comparison of Regulatory Frameworks

被引:3
作者
Siegel, Caroline [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ St Gallen, Inst Insurance Econ, CH-9000 St Gallen, Switzerland
关键词
group supervision; insurance group; regulation; risk-based capital; Solvency II; Swiss Solvency test; GROUP DIVERSIFICATION;
D O I
10.1057/gpp.2013.3
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
As a reaction to the increasing trend of insurers forming and participating in financial conglomerates and insurance groups, supervisory authorities are currently developing group-wide solvency regulations. The International Association of Insurance Supervisors (IAIS) recently published an issues paper that discusses the challenges to group supervision and defines criteria for a thorough group solvency framework. Based on these criteria, this article provides an overview and comparison of three important approaches-the U. S. solo-plus approach of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners, Switzerland's group structure model and the Solvency II Directive on Group Solvency Assessment. The analysis reveals various deficits within the group regulation of the United States implying the need for future regulatory work. By contrast, the performance of the European frameworks with regard to the IAIS criteria is good. In particular, the Swiss framework can be seen as a prime example of an innovative and solid group solvency assessment. The Geneva Papers (2013) 38, 308-331. doi:10.1057/gpp.2013.3
引用
收藏
页码:308 / 331
页数:24
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2009, OFF J EUR UNION
[2]  
Casualty Actuarial Society (CAS), 2012, 1 CAS, P1
[3]  
CEIOPS, 2009, LESS LEARN CRIS
[4]  
CEIOPS, 2009, CEIOPS ADV LEV 2 IMP
[5]  
Committee of European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Supervisors (CEIOPS), 2010, SOLV 2 CAL PAP
[6]   Group aspects of regulatory reform in the insurance sector [J].
Darlap, P ;
Mayr, B .
GENEVA PAPERS ON RISK AND INSURANCE-ISSUES AND PRACTICE, 2006, 31 (01) :96-123
[7]  
EC, 1998, OFFICIAL J EUROPEAN, VL330, P32
[8]  
EC (European Commission), 2010, QIS5 TECHN SPEC
[9]  
Eling M., 2008, J INSURANCE REGULATI, V26, P31
[10]  
Embrechts P., 2002, RISK MANAGEMENT VALU