Corroborating social media echelon in cancer research

被引:0
作者
Arif Mehmood
Byung-Won On
Ingyu Lee
Han Woo Park
Gyu Sang Choi
机构
[1] Yeungnam University,Department of Information and Communication Engineering
[2] Kunsan National University,Department of Statistics and Computer Science
[3] Troy University,Sorrel College of Business
[4] Yeungnam University,Department of Media and Communication
来源
Quality & Quantity | 2018年 / 52卷
关键词
Data mining; Social network analysis; Cancer; Co-authorship network; Co-institutions network; World and cancer;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Worldwide medical facilities differ, and for this reason, the causes of death can vary. Cancer is considered the second leading cause of death after heart disease worldwide, and the same causes of death are observed in the United States (US). Therefore, the purposes of this study are to explore worldwide research levels in the field of cancer and the social collaboration of researchers and institutions in this field. This article examines the structural patterns of international co-authors and co-institutions in science citation index papers in cancer research. The study uses measures from the social network analysis method, including degree centrality, betweenness centrality, eigenvector centrality, and effectiveness, to investigate the effects of social networks in the area of cancer research. Empirical analysis results identify the US is the most central country, followed by Germany, Italy, France, and China, in terms of co-authored networks in this research field. Institutional analysis results indicate that the University of Milan is at the top in terms of degree centrality. The Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus in France and German University of Düsseldorf occupy the second and fourth positions, respectively. The University of California in Los Angeles and Harvard University, both in the US, are at third and fifth positions, respectively.
引用
收藏
页码:801 / 813
页数:12
相关论文
共 66 条
  • [1] Biscaro C(2014)Co-authorship and bibliographic coupling network effects on citations Plos One 9 e99502-120
  • [2] Giupponi C(1972)Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identification J. Math. Sociol. 2 113-212
  • [3] Bonacich P(2015)The triple helix and international collaboration in science J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 66 201-239
  • [4] Choi S(1978)Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification Soc. Netw. 1 215-154
  • [5] Yang JS(1991)Centrality in valued graphs: a measure of betweenness based on network flow Soc. Netw. 13 141-37
  • [6] Park HW(2014)Joint bibliometric analysis of patents and scholarly publications from cross-disciplinary projects: implications for development of evaluative metrics J. Contemp. East. Asia 13 19-2234
  • [7] Freeman LC(2014)Cities and the geographical deconcentration of scientific activity: a multilevel analysis of publications (1987–2007) Urban Stud. 51 2219-15
  • [8] Freeman LC(1989)An algorithm for drawing general undirected graphs Inf. Process. Lett. 31 7-557
  • [9] Borgatti SP(2016)Theories in communication science: a structural analysis using webometrics and social network approach Scientometrics 108 531-176
  • [10] White DR(2012)Has globalization strengthened South Korea’s national research system? National and international dynamics of the Triple Helix of scientific co-authorship relationships in South Korea Scientometrics 90 163-193