SDGs in corporate responsibility reporting: a longitudinal investigation of institutional determinants and financial performance

被引:0
作者
Ambra Galeazzo
Toloue Miandar
Michela Carraro
机构
[1] Università degli Studi di Padova,Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Aziendali “Marco Fanno”
[2] Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna,Dipartimento di Scienze Aziendali
来源
Journal of Management and Governance | 2024年 / 28卷
关键词
Sustainability; SDGs; Corporate responsibility; Corporate responsibility reporting; Financial performance;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Companies play a central role in the achievement of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs); as such, they face institutional pressures to increase their engagement with SDGs. However, given the complexity of SDGs, it is unclear whether these pressures lead firms to adopt engagement approaches that address a few goals or the whole set of 17, and if that choice has any subsequent effect on financial performance. To shed light on these issues, this research draws on the neo-institutional theory to investigate whether two institutional determinants—industry type and country of origin—affect SDG engagement and whether such engagement improves financial performance. Based on a content analysis and a regression analysis on high-reputation companies (the 100 most sustainable firms in the world) over the period 2017–2020, we find that the institutional pressures associated with industry type and country-of-origin positively impact any engagement approach to SDGs. However, we establish that companies’ financial performance only generally improves when engaging with either the whole set of SDGs or a specific subset of the most frequently cited. This study provides important theoretical and practical contributions that illuminate firms’ institutional and financial rationales for adopting SDGs.
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 136
页数:23
相关论文
共 137 条
[1]  
Adams CA(2008)Integrating sustainability reporting into management practices Accounting Forum 32 288-302
[2]  
Frost GR(2020)Which country characteristics support corporate social performance? Sustainable Development 28 670-684
[3]  
Alonso-Martínez D(2005)Evolving sustainably: A longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development Strategic Management Journal 26 197-218
[4]  
de Marchi V(2012)Does it pay to be really good? Addressing the shape of the relationship between social and financial performance Strategic Management Journal 33 1304-1320
[5]  
di Maria E(2022)A systematic literature review on personal financial well-being: The link to key Sustainable Development Goals 2030 Fortune Institute International Business Review 31 2-24
[6]  
Bansal P(2018)Achieving the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals: An enabling role for accounting research Accounting Auditing and Accountability Journal 52 103-126
[7]  
Barnett ML(2009)Environmental performance and executive compensation: An integrated agency-institutional perspective Academy of Management Journal 15 488-504
[8]  
Salomon RM(2019)EASIER: An evaluation model for public-private partnerships contributing to the sustainable development goals Sustainability 35 1107-1136
[9]  
Bashir I(2006)Neo-institutional theory and institutional change: Toward empirical tests on the “Americanization” of german executive pay International Business Review 136 675-685
[10]  
Qureshi IH(2021)The CSR–CFP relationship in the presence of institutional voids and the moderating role of family ownership Asian Business and Management 48 147-160