Serum fatty acid binding protein 4 and Doppler of uterine artery ultrasound in the first trimester for the prediction of preeclampsia

被引:0
作者
Chaiyawut Paiboonborirak
Vorapong Phupong
机构
[1] Chulalongkorn University,Placental Related Diseases Research Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine
来源
Hypertension Research | 2024年 / 47卷
关键词
Preeclampsia; Predictive value; Uterine artery Doppler; Serum FABP4 levels;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The objective of this study was to determine the predictive value of serum fatty acid binding protein 4 (FABP4) combined with Doppler of the uterine artery in singleton pregnancy at gestational age (GA) 11–13+6 weeks for prediction of preeclampsia. A prospective observational study included singleton pregnant women at GA 11–13+6 weeks and was conducted at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand, between December 2020 and April 2022. Serum FABP4 levels and Doppler of the uterine artery were performed. Pregnancy outcomes were recorded. The predictive values of these combined tests at the optimal cut-off values were determined to predict preeclampsia. A total of 330 participants with 15 cases of preeclampsia (4.5%) and 6 cases of them had preterm preeclampsia (GA < 37 weeks) (1.8%) were analyzed. Women with preeclampsia had significantly higher serum FABP4 levels than normal pregnant women (12.9 ± 6.5 ng/ml vs 10.1 ± 4.8 ng/ml, p = 0.034) but no difference in the mean pulsatility index (PI) of the uterine artery and the presence of an early diastolic notch. When using serum FABP4 levels greater than 1.0 multiple of the median of GA as a cut-off value to predict preeclampsia, combined with abnormal Doppler PI of the uterine artery, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 73.3%, 47.3%, 6.2%, and 97.4%, respectively. This study demonstrated that serum FABP4 levels combined with Doppler of the uterine artery at GA 11–13+6 weeks were effective in predicting preeclampsia.
引用
收藏
页码:1208 / 1215
页数:7
相关论文
共 80 条
[1]  
Khan KS(2006)WHO analysis of causes of maternal death: a systematic review Lancet 367 1066-74
[2]  
Wojdyla D(2013)Global and regional estimates of preeclampsia and eclampsia: a systematic review Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 170 1-7
[3]  
Say L(2008)Molecular mechanisms of preeclampsia Microvasc Res 75 1-8
[4]  
Gulmezoglu AM(2020)ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 222 Obstet Gynecol 135 e237-60
[5]  
Van Look PF(2015)Proliferation of trophoblasts and Ki67 expression in preeclampsia Arch Gynecol Obstet 291 1041-6
[6]  
Abalos E(2009)The two stage model of preeclampsia: variations on the theme Placenta 30 S32-7
[7]  
Cuesta C(2004)World Health Organization systematic review of screening tests for preeclampsia Obstet Gynecol 104 1367-91
[8]  
Grosso AL(2008)Prediction of pre-eclampsia by a combination of maternal history, uterine artery Doppler and mean arterial pressure Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 32 877-83
[9]  
Chou D(2022)First trimester preeclampsia screening and prediction Am J Obstet Gynecol 226 S1071-97.e2
[10]  
Say L(2015)Fatty Acid-Binding Protein 4 (FABP4): pathophysiological insights and potent clinical biomarker of metabolic and cardiovascular diseases Clin Med Insights Cardiol 8 23-33