The 90A° rotation technique improves the ease of insertion of the ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway in children

被引:16
作者
Yun, Mi-Ja [2 ]
Hwang, Jung-Won [1 ]
Park, Sang-Heon [1 ]
Han, Sung-Hee [1 ]
Park, Hee-Pyoung [3 ]
Kim, Jin-Hee [1 ]
Jeon, Young-Tae [1 ]
Lee, Sang-Chul [3 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Seoul Natl Univ Bundang Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Med, Songnam, South Korea
[2] Natl Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Med, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Med, Seoul, South Korea
来源
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE | 2011年 / 58卷 / 04期
关键词
ANESTHETIZED PATIENTS; STANDARD; ANESTHESIA; CROSSOVER;
D O I
10.1007/s12630-010-9452-8
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
A previous study using a 180A degrees rotation to insert the ProSeal (TM) laryngeal mask airway (LMA ProSeal) in children did not show improvement over the standard technique. We used a 90A degrees rotation technique to insert the LMA ProSeal in pediatric patients and compared ease of insertion and pharyngeal trauma with the standard technique. This prospective randomized controlled study included 126 patients aged three to nine years. Anesthesia was induced with thiopental and rocuronium, and the LMA ProSeal used in the study ranged in size from 2 to 3 depending on the patient's body weight. In the control group (n = 63), the LMA ProSeal was inserted using the index finger. In the rotation group (n = 63), the entire cuff of the LMA ProSeal was placed in the patient's mouth without finger insertion and rotated 90A degrees counter clockwise around the tongue. The LMA ProSeal was then advanced and rotated back until resistance was felt. The primary outcome was the insertion success rate at first attempt. The success rate of insertion at first attempt was higher with the rotation technique than with the standard technique (97% vs 70%, respectively; P < 0.001) and the insertion time was shorter (16 +/- A 6 sec vs 30 +/- A 24 sec, respectively; P < 0.001). Mean blood pressure after LMA ProSeal insertion increased significantly in the control group (62 +/- A 12 to 69 +/- A 17 mmHg; P = 0.01), but not in the rotation group. The incidence of blood staining was lower in the rotation group than in the control group (10% vs 25%, respectively; P = 0.03), but the incidence of sore throat was not significantly different (24% vs 22%, respectively; P = 0.9). The 90A degrees rotation technique improves ease of insertion of the LMA ProSeal in children, and it decreases the risk of pharyngeal trauma. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01076725).
引用
收藏
页码:379 / 383
页数:5
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway - A randomized, crossover study with the standard laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed, anesthetized patients [J].
Brimacombe, J ;
Keller, C .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2000, 93 (01) :104-109
[2]   Pharyngolaryngeal, neck, and jaw discomfort after anesthesia with the face mast and laryngeal mask airway at high and low cuff volumes in males and females [J].
Brimacombe, J ;
Holyoake, L ;
Keller, C ;
Brimacombe, N ;
Scully, M ;
Barry, J ;
Talbutt, P ;
Sartain, J ;
McMahon, P .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2000, 93 (01) :26-+
[3]   A multicenter study comparing the ProSeal™ and Classic™ laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized, nonparalyzed patients [J].
Brimacombe, J ;
Keller, C ;
Fullekrug, B ;
Agrò, F ;
Rosenblatt, W ;
Dierdorf, SF ;
de Lucas, EG ;
Capdevilla, X ;
Brimacombe, N .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2002, 96 (02) :289-295
[4]   Reliability of epigastric auscultation to detect gastric insufflation [J].
Brimacombe, J ;
Keller, C ;
Kurian, S ;
Myles, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2002, 88 (01) :127-129
[5]   INSERTION OF THE LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY - A PROSPECTIVE-STUDY OF 4 TECHNIQUES [J].
BRIMACOMBE, J ;
BERRY, A .
ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 1993, 21 (01) :89-92
[6]   The ProSea™ laryngeal mask airway:: a review of the literature [J].
Cook, TM ;
Lee, G ;
Nolan, JP .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 2005, 52 (07) :739-760
[7]   Randomized crossover comparison of the ProSeal with the classic laryngeal mask airway in unparalysed anaesthetized patients [J].
Cook, TM ;
Nolan, JP ;
Verghese, C ;
Strube, PJ ;
Lees, M ;
Millar, JM ;
Baskett, PJF .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2002, 88 (04) :527-533
[8]   Laryngo-pharyngeal complaints after use of the laryngeal mask airway [J].
Figueredo, E ;
Vivar-Diago, M ;
Muñoz-Blanco, F .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1999, 46 (03) :220-225
[9]   Laryngeal mask airway insertion in children: comparison between rotational, lateral and standard technique [J].
Ghai, Babita ;
Makkar, Jeetinder Kaur ;
Bhardwaj, Neerja ;
Wig, Jyotsna .
PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2008, 18 (04) :308-312
[10]   Comparison of Two Insertion Techniques of ProSeal™ Laryngeal Mask Airway Standard versus 90-degree Rotation [J].
Hwang, Jung-won ;
Park, Hee-Pyoung ;
Lim, Young-Jin ;
Do, Sang-Hwan ;
Lee, Sang-Chul ;
Jeon, Young-Tae .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2009, 110 (04) :905-907