Supervision in psychotherapeutic training in Germany: Quantitative und qualitative Ergebnisse des Forschungsgutachtens

被引：0

作者：

Nodop S. ^{[1
]}

Thiel K. ^{[1
]}

Strauß B. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Institut für Psychosoziale Medizin und Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinikum Jena, 07740 Jena

来源：

Psychotherapeut | 2010年 / 55卷 / 6期

关键词：

Data analysis; Psychotherapy; Quality control; Supervision; Training;

D O I：

10.1007/s00278-010-0772-5

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

One of the functions of supervision in psychotherapy training is quality assurance. In order to fulfill this function the quality of supervision itself needs to be high and needs to be controlled. Thus in a large survey of psychotherapy training in Germany questions related to the quality of supervision were included in the survey. Answers to those questions from different samples (trainees, alumni, trainers, training institutes, expert organizations) were compiled. Quantitative and qualitative methods were used. Satisfaction and usefulness ratings with individual and group supervision were high to very high. Supervision amount, group size and frequency were rated as adequate. Criticism pertained to the lack of systematic evaluation, insufficient qualification of the supervisors and lacking integration of supervision into the whole training. As supervision is a very important part of psychotherapy training measures for quality assurance and improvement are necessary. © 2010 Springer-Verlag.

引用

页码：485 / 495

页数：10

共 31 条

[1]

Auckenthaler A., Supervision von Psychotherapie: Behauptungen - Fakten - Trends, Psychotherapeut, 44, pp. 139-152, (1999)

[2]

Barthel Y., Lebiger-Vogel J., Zwerenz R., Et al., Kandidaten in psychotherapeutischer Ausbildung: Zugang und Zufriedenheit, Z Klin Theor Prax, 26, pp. 87-100, (2010)

[3]

Bayer J., Ausbildungszufriedenheit - Ein Aspekt des Qualitätsmanagements in der Ausbildung zum Psychologischen Psychotherapeuten in Verhaltenstherapie, (2007)

[4]

Borg-Laufs M., Prozessqualität der Ausbildung in Psychotherapie/Verhaltenstherapie und ihre Sicherung, pp. 53-101, (2005)

[5]

Bortz J., Doring N., Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation für Sozialwissenschaftler, (1995)

[6]

Buehner B., On becoming a psychotherapist: The experience of good supervision, Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering. ProQuest Information and Learning, (1998)

[7]

Ellis M.V., Krengel M., Ladany N., Et al., Clinical supervision research from 1981 to 1993: A methodological critique, J Couns Psychol, 43, pp. 35-50, (1996)

[8]

Frank R., Qualitätssicherung durch Psychotherapie-Supervision, pp. 647-682, (1998)

[9]

Freitas G.J., The impact of psychotherapy supervision on client outcome: A critical examination of two decades of research, Psychother Theory Res Pract Train, 39, pp. 354-367, (2002)

[10]

Freyberger H.J., Professionalisierung der Supervision, (2010)

← 1 2 3 4 →