Machine learning applications in prostate cancer magnetic resonance imaging

被引:0
作者
Renato Cuocolo
Maria Brunella Cipullo
Arnaldo Stanzione
Lorenzo Ugga
Valeria Romeo
Leonardo Radice
Arturo Brunetti
Massimo Imbriaco
机构
[1] University of Naples “Federico II”,Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences
来源
European Radiology Experimental | / 3卷
关键词
Machine learning; Magnetic resonance imaging; Prostate; Prostatic neoplasms; Radiomics;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
With this review, we aimed to provide a synopsis of recently proposed applications of machine learning (ML) in radiology focusing on prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). After defining the difference between ML and classical rule-based algorithms and the distinction among supervised, unsupervised and reinforcement learning, we explain the characteristic of deep learning (DL), a particular new type of ML, including its structure mimicking human neural networks and its ‘black box’ nature. Differences in the pipeline for applying ML and DL to prostate MRI are highlighted. The following potential clinical applications in different settings are outlined, many of them based only on MRI-unenhanced sequences: gland segmentation; assessment of lesion aggressiveness to distinguish between clinically significant and indolent cancers, allowing for active surveillance; cancer detection/diagnosis and localisation (transition versus peripheral zone, use of prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) version 2), reading reproducibility, differentiation of cancers from prostatitis benign hyperplasia; local staging and pre-treatment assessment (detection of extraprostatic disease extension, planning of radiation therapy); and prediction of biochemical recurrence. Results are promising, but clinical applicability still requires more robust validation across scanner vendors, field strengths and institutions.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 234 条
[1]  
Siegel RL(2018)Cancer statistics, 2018 CA Cancer J Clin 68 7-30
[2]  
Miller KD(2017)EAU-ESTRO-SIOG Guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent Eur Urol 71 618-629
[3]  
Jemal A(2019)Multiparametric MRI and radiomics in prostate cancer: a review Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 42 3-25
[4]  
Mottet N(2019)Head-to-head comparison of transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy versus multiparametric prostate resonance imaging with subsequent magnetic resonance-guided biopsy in biopsy-naïve men with elevated prostate-specific antigen: a large prospective multicenter clinical study Eur Urol 75 570-578
[5]  
Bellmunt J(2018)MRI to guide biopsies or avoid biopsies? Curr Opin Urol 28 522-528
[6]  
Bolla M(2016)Synopsis of the PI-RADS v2 guidelines for multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging and recommendations for use Eur Urol 69 41-49
[7]  
Sun Y(2016)Biparametric 3T magnetic resonance imaging for prostatic cancer detection in a biopsy-naïve patient population: a further improvement of PI-RADS v2? Eur J Radiol 85 2269-2274
[8]  
Reynolds HM(2018)PSA-density does not improve bi-parametric prostate MR detection of prostate cancer in a biopsy naïve patient population Eur J Radiol 104 64-70
[9]  
Parameswaran B(2017)A Prospective Comparison of Selective Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion-Targeted and Systematic Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Biopsies for Detecting Prostate Cancer in Men Undergoing Repeated Biopsies Urologia Internationalis 99 384-391
[10]  
van der Leest M(2017)The learning curve in prostate MRI interpretation: self-directed learning versus continual reader feedback AJR Am J Roentgenol 208 W92-W100