Proximity, Strategic Groups and Reputation: An Exploratory Study of Reputation in Higher Education

被引:18
作者
Finch D. [1 ]
Hillenbrand C. [2 ]
Rubin H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Bissett School of Business, Mount Royal University, Calgary, AB
[2] Henley Business School, University of Reading, Oxfordshire
关键词
Proximity; reputation; stakeholders; strategic groups;
D O I
10.1057/crr.2015.8
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper explores the idea that stakeholder proximity, that is, how much/little experience a stakeholder has with a focal organization, impacts the extent to which stakeholders rely on strategic group characteristics as an anchor when judging the reputation of higher education institutions. We synthesize theories from psychology (ie, cognitive categorization theory) and management (ie, strategic group theory) to explore how stakeholder proximity may influence the formation of organizational reputation. Specifically, we examine how the proximity of three key stakeholders (N=1,049; prospective students, parents of students and hiring managers of new graduates) influences the perceived strategic character and generalized favorability of three distinct groups of post-secondary institutions (research-intensive universities, teaching-intensive universities and career colleges). Our results suggest that high proximity stakeholders rely less on strategic group characteristics, while reputation at a strategic group level is suggested to have greater influence on stakeholders who have less direct experience of and low proximity to an organization. Interestingly, our findings reveal some consistent differences between perceptions of prospective students and hiring managers that pose important theoretical questions about the role and impact of direct experiences in the reputation-building process, while also suggesting that higher education institutions may benefit significantly from differentiated marketing strategies according to issues of proximity. © 2015 Macmillan Publishers Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:174 / 194
页数:20
相关论文
共 90 条
[1]  
Adamuti-Trache M., Hawkey C., Schuetze H.G., Glickman V., The labour market value of liberal arts and applied education programs: Evidence from British Columbia, Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 36, 2, pp. 49-74, (2006)
[2]  
Adler N.J., Harzing A.W., When knowledge wins: Transcending the sense and nonsense of academic rankings, Academy of Management Learning & Education, 8, 1, pp. 72-95, (2009)
[3]  
Alessandri S., Yang S., Kinsey D., An integrative approach to university visual identity and reputation, Corporate Reputation Review, 9, 4, pp. 258-270, (2006)
[4]  
Bakewell C.J., Gibson-Sweet M.F., Strategic marketing in a changing environment: Are the new UK universities in danger of being "stuck in the middle, International Journal of Educational Management, 12, 3, pp. 108-113, (1998)
[5]  
Bankston C., The mass production of credentials, The Independent Review, 15, 3, pp. 325-349, (2011)
[6]  
Barnett M.L., Hoffman A., Beyond corporate reputation: Managing reputational interdependence, Corporate Reputation Review, 11, 1, pp. 1-9, (2008)
[7]  
Barnett M.L., Jermier J.M., Lafferty B.A., Corporate reputation: The definitional landscape, Corporate Reputation Review, 9, 1, pp. 26-38, (2006)
[8]  
Baron R., Byrne D., Branscombe N., Social Psychology, (2006)
[9]  
Bennett R., Ali-Choudhury R., Prospective students' perceptions of university brands: An empirical study, Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 19, 1, pp. 85-107, (2009)
[10]  
Binsardi A., Ekwulugo F., International marketing of British education: Research on the students perception and the UK market penetration, Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 21, 5, pp. 318-327, (2003)