Preclinical dental students self-assessment of an improved operative dentistry virtual reality simulator with haptic feedback

被引:0
作者
Pedro Rodrigues
Francisco Nicolau
Martim Norte
Ezequiel Zorzal
João Botelho
Vanessa Machado
Luís Proença
Ricardo Alves
Carlos Zagalo
Daniel Simões Lopes
José João Mendes
机构
[1] Clinical Research Unit (CRU),Instituto Superior Técnico
[2] Egas Moniz Center for Interdisciplinary Research,ICT/UNIFESP, Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia
[3] Egas Moniz School of Health and Science,undefined
[4] Egas Moniz Center for Interdisciplinary Research,undefined
[5] Egas Moniz School of Health and Science,undefined
[6] Universidade de Lisboa,undefined
[7] INESC ID,undefined
[8] Universidade Federal de São Paulo,undefined
[9] IPO Lisboa,undefined
[10] Instituto Português de Oncologia Francisco Gentil,undefined
[11] ITI/LARSyS,undefined
来源
Scientific Reports | / 13卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
To test and evaluate the second installment of DENTIFY, a virtual reality haptic simulator for Operative Dentistry (OD), on preclinical dental students, by focusing on user performance and self-assessment. Twenty voluntary unpaid preclinical dental students, with different background experience, were enrolled for this study. After the completion of an informed consent, a demographic questionnaire, and being introduced to the prototype (on the first testing session), three testing sessions followed (S1, S2, S3). Each session involved the following steps: (I) free experimentation; (II) task execution; S3 also included (III) completion of questionnaires associated with the experiment (total of 8 Self-Assessment Questions (SAQ)); and (IV) guided interview. As expected, drill time decreased steadily for all tasks when increasing prototype use, verified by RM ANOVA. Regarding performance metrics (Comparisons by Student’s t-test and ANOVA) recorded at S3, in overall, a higher performance was verified for participants with the following characteristics: female, non-gamer, no previous VR experience and with over 2 semesters of previous experience of working on phantom models. The correlation between the participants’ performance (drill time), for the four tasks, and user self-assessment evaluation, verified by Spearman’s rho analysis, allowed to conclude that a higher performance was observed in students who responded that DENTIFY improved their self perception of manual force applied. Regarding the questionnaires, Spearman’s rho analysis showed a positive correlation between the improvement DENTIFY inputs on conventional teaching sensed by students, also enhancing their interest in learning OD, their desire to have more simulator hours and the improvement sensed on manual dexterity. All participating students adhered well to the DENTIFY experimentation. DENTIFY allows for student self-assessment and contributes to improving student performance. Simulators with VR and haptic pens for teaching in OD should be designed as a consistent and gradual teaching strategy, allowing multiplicity of simulated scenarios, bimanual manipulation, and the possibility of real-time feedback to allow for the student’s immediate self-assessment. Additionally, they should create performance reports per student to ensure self-perception/criticism of their evolution over longer periods of learning time.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]  
Mallikarjun SA(2014)Haptics in periodontics J. Indian Soc. Periodontol. 18 112-37
[2]  
Tiwari S(2015)A review of the use of simulation in dental education Simul. Healthc. 10 31-338
[3]  
Sathyanarayana S(2017)Computerized virtual reality simulation in preclinical dentistry: can a computerized simulator replace the conventional phantom heads and human instruction? Simul. Healthc. 12 332-121
[4]  
Devi PR(2011)Intelligent dental training simulator with objective skill assessment and feedback Artif. Intell. Med. 52 115-47
[5]  
Perry S(2017)The need for virtual reality simulators in dental education: A review Saudi Dental J. 29 41-248
[6]  
Bridges SM(2015)The vr book: Human-centered design for virtual reality Morgan Claypool 11 238-55
[7]  
Burrow MF(2016)Reporting guidelines for health care simulation research Simul. Healthc. J. Soc. Simul. Healthc. 146 53-1051
[8]  
Plessas A(2021)An immersive educational tool for dental implant placement: A study on user acceptance Int. J. Med. Inf. 36 1043-792
[9]  
Rhienmora P(2010)Haptic virtual reality for skill acquisition in endodontics J. Endodont. 13 782-1265
[10]  
Haddawy P(2016)A review of computer-aided oral and maxillofacial surgery: planning, simulation and navigation Expert Rev. Med. Dev. 77 1258-409