The national risk index: establishing a nationwide baseline for natural hazard risk in the US

被引:0
作者
Casey Zuzak
Matthew Mowrer
Emily Goodenough
Jordan Burns
Nicholas Ranalli
Jesse Rozelle
机构
[1] US Federal Emergency Management Agency,
[2] Compass PTS JV (ABS Group),undefined
[3] FACTOR,undefined
[4] Inc,undefined
[5] Compass PTS JV (CDM Smith,undefined
[6] Inc.),undefined
来源
Natural Hazards | 2022年 / 114卷
关键词
National risk index; Natural hazards; Risk methodology; Multi-hazard; Expected annual loss;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The National Risk Index developed by the Federal Emergency Management Agency provides a relative measurement of community-level natural hazard risk across 50 US states and Washington, DC. The Index leverages authoritative nationwide datasets and multiplies values for exposure, annualized frequency, and historic loss ratio to derive expected annual loss estimates for 18 hazard types and combines this metric with Social Vulnerability and Community Resilience scores to generate Risk Index scores for every Census tract and county. Scores provide a holistic and comparable measure of risk across the US. Risk scores and underlying data are summarized in a custom web application. Geographical and statistical processing techniques were used to reconcile incompatibilities between the spatial and temporal collection of input datasets. The index was developed using a multidisciplinary and collaborative approach and input from subject matter experts across disciplines and target users. The National Risk Index builds upon previous efforts to develop a multi-hazard risk measurement for a large geography by expanding the number of hazard types considered, applying extensive geoprocessing techniques to combine diverse datasets, and combining traditional risk factors with the community risk factors of social vulnerability and community resilience for an enhanced nationwide picture of risk.
引用
收藏
页码:2331 / 2355
页数:24
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]  
Argyle EM(2017)Toward a user-centered design of a weather forecasting decision-support tool Bull Am Meteor Soc 98 373-382
[2]  
Gourley JJ(2014)An objective analysis of tornado risk in the United States Weather Forecast 29 366-376
[3]  
Zachary LF(2014)The geographies of community disaster resilience Global Environ Chang 29 65-77
[4]  
Hansen T(2003)Social vulnerability to environmental hazards Soc Sci Q 84 242-261
[5]  
Manroos K(2010)Disaster resilience indicators for benchmarking baseline conditions J Homel Secur Emerg Manag 7 1-22
[6]  
Coleman TA(2018)2018 update to the U.S. geological survey national volcanic threat assessment U S Geol Surv Sci Investig Rep 38 21-44
[7]  
Dixon PG(2006)Comparative risk assessments for the city of Cologne—storms, floods, earthquakes Nat Hazards 41 203-223
[8]  
Cutter SL(1973)Transformations: an introduction and a bibliography Int Stat Rev 1 11-27
[9]  
Ash KD(1981)On the quantitative definition of risk Risk Anal 64 1925-1958
[10]  
Emrich CT(2012)Challenges of analyzing multi-hazard risk: a review Nat Hazards 3 408-429