Outcome of intra-arterial thrombolysis in patients with diabetes and acute lower limb ischemia: a propensity score adjusted analysis

被引:0
作者
Talha Butt
Anders Gottsäter
Jan Apelqvist
Gunnar Engström
Stefan Acosta
机构
[1] Lund University,Department of Clinical Sciences
[2] Skåne University Hospital,Vascular Centre, Department of Cardio
[3] Skåne University Hospital,Thoracic and Vascular Surgery
来源
Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis | 2017年 / 44卷
关键词
Acute lower limb ischemia; Diabetes mellitus; Propensity score adjusted analysis; Thrombolysis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The presence of diabetes mellitus is rarely addressed in acute lower limb ischaemia (ALLI). The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of local intra-arterial thrombolysis for ALLI in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). Outcome of all thrombolytic events performed in an endovascular first-strategy centre during a 13-year period between 2001 and 2013 in patients with ALLI were followed to January 2017. A propensity score adjusted analysis was performed to evaluate results in patients with (n = 83) versus without (n = 316) DM. Patients with DM were younger (p = 0.001), more often women (p = 0.014), more often had renal insufficiency (p = 0.041), foot ulcers (p < 0.001), and thrombosis (p = 0.032) than the patients without DM. At presentation, patients with DM had a lower degree of ischemia judged by the Rutherford classification, compared to those without DM (p = 0.023). None of the 83 diabetic patients had a popliteal artery aneurysm, compared to 25 (7.9%) of the 316 patients without DM (p = 0.008). The amount of tPA administered to patients with DM was higher than to patients without DM (p = 0.03). In the propensity score adjusted analysis, patients with DM had a higher rate of major amputation at 1 (OR 2.52; 95% CI 1.22–5.20) and 3 years (OR 2.52; 95% CI 1.26–5.04), and a lower amputation-free survival at 3 years (OR 0.46; 95% CI 0.25–0.85), than those without DM. Patients with DM presenting with ALLI differ in clinical characteristics, presentation, and aetiology compared to patients with DM, and have a higher rate of major amputation and lower amputation-free survival rate after intra-arterial thrombolysis.
引用
收藏
页码:475 / 480
页数:5
相关论文
共 124 条
[1]  
Taha AG(2015)Comparative effectiveness of endovascular versus surgical revascularization for acute lower extremity ischemia J Vasc Surg 61 147-154
[2]  
Byrne RM(2014)Contemporary outcomes of endovascular interventions for acute limb ischemia J Vasc Surg 59 988-995
[3]  
Avgerinos ED(2007)Vascular involvement in diabetic subjects with ischemic foot ulcer: a new morphologic categorization of disease severity Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 33 453-460
[4]  
Marone LK(2011)Role of endovascular intervention in patients with diabetic foot ulcer and concomitant peripheral arterial disease Int Angiol 30 349-358
[5]  
Makaroun MS(2014)Outcome after thrombolysis for occluded endoprosthesis, bypasses and native arteries in patients with lower limb ischemia Thromb Res 134 23-28
[6]  
Chaer RA(1997)Recommended standards for reports dealing with lower extremity ischemia, revised version J Vasc Surg 26 517-538
[7]  
Byrne RM(2004)National audit of thrombolysis for acute leg ischemia (NATALI): clinical factors associated with early outcome J Vasc Surg 39 1018-1025
[8]  
Taha AG(2007)Relaxing the rule of ten events per variable in logistic and cox regression Am J Epidemiol 165 710-718
[9]  
Avgerinos E(2003)Comparison of logistic regression versus propensity score when the number of events is low and there are multiple confounders Am J Epidemiol 158 280-287
[10]  
Marone LK(2008)Comparing treatment effects after adjustment with multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression and propensity score methods Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 17 1-8