Optimal scan time for evaluating pancreatic disease with positron emission tomography using F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose

被引:0
作者
Yuji Nakamoto
Tsuneo Saga
Tatsuya Higashi
Takayoshi Ishimori
Hisataka Kobayashi
Koichi Ishizu
Noriko Sato
Marcelo Mamede
Harumi Sakahara
Masayuki Imamura
Junji Konishi
机构
[1] Kyoto University,Department of Nuclear Medicine and Diagnostic Imaging, Graduate School of Medicine
[2] Hamamatsu University School of Medicine,Department of Radiology
[3] Kyoto University,Department of Surgery and Surgical Basic Science, Graduate School of Medicine
[4] Institute of Biomedical Research and Innovation,Department of Image
来源
Annals of Nuclear Medicine | 2003年 / 17卷
关键词
FDG; PET; pancreatic cancer; optimal scan time;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Image interpretation in positron emission tomography (PET) using F-18-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (FDG) is usually performed for images obtained at 1 h postinjection (PI) of FDG, but it remains unknown whether this is the optimal time for imaging patients with pancreatic disease. The aim of this study was to assess the optimal scan time for FDG-PET for patients suspected of having pancreatic cancer.Patients and Methods: Forty-four patients with suspected pancreatic cancer underwent FDG-PET scans at both 1 h and 2 h PI. Tracer uptake in the pancreatic lesions and possible liver metastasis was interpreted qualitatively, using a 5-point grading system (0 = normal, 1 = probably normal, 2 = equivocal, 3 = probably abnormal, and 4 = definitely abnormal) by 4 nuclear medicine physicians independently, who were blind to all clinical information. Detection performance with each image was compared using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. An average score of the 4 readers for each patient was also defined as consensus average index (CAI) and compared between the two images.Results: ROC results indicated no significant differences in detection performance (Averaged areas under ROC curves of 1 h vs. 2 h were 0.92 vs. 0.90 for primary tumor, and 0.81 vs. 0.85 for liver metastases). There were no significant differences in CAIs between 1 h and 2 h PI images in interpreting primary tumor and positive liver metastases, but a significant difference was observed for cases without liver metastases (p<0.05).Conclusions: The certainty of excluding liver metastases was increased when the 2h image was used, although ROC analysis did not establish a difference between 1 h and 2 h imaging for differentiating malignant and benign lesions in primary pancreatic cancer or its liver metastases.
引用
收藏
页码:421 / 426
页数:5
相关论文
共 94 条
[11]  
Port M(1996)FDG-PET in the prediction of survival of patients with cancer of the pancreas: a pilot study Eur J Nucl Med 23 1409-1415
[12]  
Hildebrandt M(1998)Fluorine-18 deoxyglucose and false-positive results: a major problem in the diagnostics of oncological patients Eur J Nucl Med 25 259-264
[13]  
Gansauge F(2000)Focal fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose accumulation in inflammatory pancreatic disease Cancer 89 2547-2554
[14]  
Bares R(1999)Delayed (18) F-fluoro-2-deoxy- Eur J Nucl Med 26 22-30
[15]  
Klever P(1999)-glucose positron emission tomography scan for differentiation between malignant and benign lesions in the pancreas Eur J Nucl Med 26 226-230
[16]  
Hauptmann S(1999)A PET study of Eur J Nucl Med 26 1345-1348
[17]  
Hellwig D(2001)FDG uptake in soft tissue masses Eur J Nucl Med 28 696-703
[18]  
Fass J(2000)Optimal scan time for fluorine-18 fluorode-oxyglucose positron emission tomography in breast cancer Eur J Nucl Med 27 1835-1838
[19]  
Cremerius U(1992)Dual time point fluorine-18 fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography: a potential method to differentiate malignancy from inflammation and normal tissue in the head and neck Invest Radiol 27 723-731
[20]  
Inokuma T(undefined)Advantage of delayed whole-body FDG-PET imaging for tumour detection undefined undefined undefined-undefined