Open versus laparoscopic umbilical and epigastric hernia repair: nationwide data on short- and long-term outcomes

[1] Helgstrand F(2013)Nationwide prospective study on readmission after umbilical or epigastric hernia repair Hernia 17 487-492

[2] Jorgensen LN(2013)Long-term complaints after elective repair for small umbilical or epigastric hernias Hernia 17 211-215

[3] Rosenberg J(2020)Guidelines for treatment of umbilical and epigastric hernias from the European Hernia Society and Americas Hernia Society Br J Surg 107 171-190

[4] Kehlet H(2016)The Danish Ventral Hernia Database - a valuable tool for quality assessment and research Clin Epidemiol 8 719-723

[5] Bisgaard T(2018)The importance of registries in the postmarketing surveillance of surgical meshes Ann Surg 268 1097-1104

[6] Erritzoe-Jervild L(2020)Differential recurrence after laparoscopic incisional hernia repair: importance of a nationwide registry-based mesh surveillance Br J Surg 107 1130-1136

[7] Christoffersen MW(2017)Laparoscopic versus open umbilical or paraumbilical hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis Hernia 21 905-916

[8] Helgstrand F(2014)Laparoscopy versus laparotomy in the repair of ventral hernias: systematic review and meta-analysis Arq Gastroenterol 51 205-211

[9] Bisgaard T(2009)Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing open and laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair with mesh Br J Surg 96 851-858

[10] Henriksen NA(2013)Outcomes of laparoscopic vs open repair of primary ventral hernias JAMA Surg 148 1043-1048

[1] Helgstrand F(2013)Nationwide prospective study on readmission after umbilical or epigastric hernia repair Hernia 17 487-492

[2] Jorgensen LN(2013)Long-term complaints after elective repair for small umbilical or epigastric hernias Hernia 17 211-215

[3] Rosenberg J(2020)Guidelines for treatment of umbilical and epigastric hernias from the European Hernia Society and Americas Hernia Society Br J Surg 107 171-190

[4] Kehlet H(2016)The Danish Ventral Hernia Database - a valuable tool for quality assessment and research Clin Epidemiol 8 719-723

[5] Bisgaard T(2018)The importance of registries in the postmarketing surveillance of surgical meshes Ann Surg 268 1097-1104

[6] Erritzoe-Jervild L(2020)Differential recurrence after laparoscopic incisional hernia repair: importance of a nationwide registry-based mesh surveillance Br J Surg 107 1130-1136

[7] Christoffersen MW(2017)Laparoscopic versus open umbilical or paraumbilical hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis Hernia 21 905-916

[8] Helgstrand F(2014)Laparoscopy versus laparotomy in the repair of ventral hernias: systematic review and meta-analysis Arq Gastroenterol 51 205-211

[9] Bisgaard T(2009)Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing open and laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair with mesh Br J Surg 96 851-858

[10] Henriksen NA(2013)Outcomes of laparoscopic vs open repair of primary ventral hernias JAMA Surg 148 1043-1048