Linear Discrimination, Ordination, and the Visualization of Selection Gradients in Modern Morphometrics

被引:0
作者
Philipp Mitteroecker
Fred Bookstein
机构
[1] University of Vienna,Department of Theoretical Biology
[2] University of Vienna,Department of Anthropology
[3] University of Washington,Department of Statistics
来源
Evolutionary Biology | 2011年 / 38卷
关键词
Canonical variate analysis; Linear discriminant function; Ordination; Principal component analysis; Procrustes; Selection gradient;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) is a multivariate classification technique frequently applied to morphometric data in various biomedical disciplines. Canonical variate analysis (CVA), the generalization of LDA for multiple groups, is often used in the exploratory style of an ordination technique (a low-dimensional representation of the data). In the rare case when all groups have the same covariance matrix, maximum likelihood classification can be based on these linear functions. Both LDA and CVA require full-rank covariance matrices, which is usually not the case in modern morphometrics. When the number of variables is close to the number of individuals, groups appear separated in a CVA plot even if they are samples from the same population. Hence, reliable classification and assessment of group separation require many more organisms than variables. A simple alternative to CVA is the projection of the data onto the principal components of the group averages (between-group PCA). In contrast to CVA, these axes are orthogonal and can be computed even when the data are not of full rank, such as for Procrustes shape coordinates arising in samples of any size, and when covariance matrices are heterogeneous. In evolutionary quantitative genetics, the selection gradient is identical to the coefficient vector of a linear discriminant function between the populations before vs. after selection. When the measured variables are Procrustes shape coordinates, discriminant functions and selection gradients are vectors in shape space and can be visualized as shape deformations. Except for applications in quantitative genetics and in classification, however, discriminant functions typically offer no interpretation as biological factors.
引用
收藏
页码:100 / 114
页数:14
相关论文
共 126 条
  • [1] Adams D. C.(1997)Morphometric inferences on sibling species and sexual dimorphism in Systematic Biology 46 180-194
  • [2] Funk D. J.(2004) leaf beetles: Multivariate applications of the thin-plate spline Italian Journal of Zoology 71 5-16
  • [3] Adams D. C.(2008)Geometric morphometrics: Ten years of progress following the “revolution” Evolution 62 2451-2461
  • [4] Rohlf F. J.(2001)Understanding the evolution and stability of the G-matrix Genetica 112–113 9-32
  • [5] Slice D. E.(2003)The adaptive landscape as a conceptual bridge between micro- and macroevolution Journal of Chemometrics 17 166-173
  • [6] Arnold S. J.(1996)Partial least squares for discrimination Bulletin of Mathematical Biology 58 313-365
  • [7] Bürger R.(2005)Biometrics, biomathematics and the morphometric synthesis International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics 19 359-366
  • [8] Holenhole P. A.(2009)A note on between-group PCA Biological Theory 4 21-28
  • [9] Beverly C. A.(1966)Megavariate genetics: What you find is what you go looking for Biometrics 22 96-110
  • [10] Jones A. G.(1981)Growth-invariant discrimination functions and generalized distances Systematic Zoology 30 268-280