Accuracy of the clinical examination to predict radiographic instability of the lumbar spine

被引:96
作者
Fritz J.M. [1 ]
Piva S.R. [2 ]
Childs J.D. [3 ]
机构
[1] Division of Physical Therapy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
[2] Department of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
[3] Wilford Hall Air Force Base, Lackland, TX
关键词
Diagnosis; Instability; Low-back pain; Radiographic assessment;
D O I
10.1007/s00586-004-0803-4
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Forty-nine patients with low-back pain referred for flexion-extension radiographs due to suspicion of lumbar instability were studied to examine the relationship between the clinical presentation and the presence of radiographic instability of the lumbar spine. Patients had a mean age of 39.2 (±11.3) years, with a mean Oswestry score of 20.4% (±13.3). The median duration of symptoms was 78 days. All patients underwent both a radiographic and clinical examination. The reliability of the radiographic variables was high, while the reliability of clinical variables ranged from moderate to good. Twenty-eight patients (57%) had radiographic instability based on published norms. Clinical variables related to the presence of radiographic instability were age, lumbar flexion range of motion, total extension range of motion, the Beighton scale for general ligamentous laxity, and segmental intervertebral motion testing. The presence of at least 53°of lumbar flexion or a lack of hypomobility with intervertebral motion testing resulted in a positive likelihood ratio of 4.3 (95% CI: 1.8, 10.6), for predicting radiographic instability. The results of this study indicate that various factors from the clinical examination are useful for predicting radiographic instability. If the findings of this study can be replicated, these clinical factors could be used to inform treatment decision-making without a sole reliance on radiographic assessment. © Springer-Verlag 2005.
引用
收藏
页码:743 / 750
页数:7
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]  
Abenhaim L., Rossignol M., Gobeille D., Bonvalot Y., Fines P., Scott S., The prognostic consequences in the making of the initial medical diagnosis of work-related back injuries, Spine, 20, pp. 791-795, (1995)
[2]  
Bednar D.A., Failure of external spinal skeletal fixation to improve predictability of lumbar arthrodesis, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 83 A, pp. 1656-1659, (2001)
[3]  
Beighton P., Horan F., Orthopedic aspects of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, J Bone Joint Surg Br, 51, pp. 444-453, (1969)
[4]  
Berlemann U., Jeszenszky D.J., Buhler D.W., Harms J., Facet joint remodeling in degenerative spondylolisthesis: An investigation of joint orientation and tropism, Eur Spine J, 7, pp. 376-380, (1998)
[5]  
Boden S.D., Wiesel S.W., Lumbosacral segmental motion in normal individuals. Have we been measuring instability properly?, Spine, 15, pp. 571-575, (1991)
[6]  
Borkan J.M., Cherkin D.C., An agenda for primary care research on low back pain, Spine, 21, pp. 2880-2884, (1996)
[7]  
Borkan J.M., Koes B., Reis S., Cherkin D.C., A report from the second international forum for primary care research on low back pain: Reexamining priorities, Spine, 23, pp. 1992-1996, (1998)
[8]  
Brown M.D., Wehman K.F., Heiner A.D., The clinical usefulness of intraoperative spinal stiffness measurements, Spine, 27, pp. 959-961, (2002)
[9]  
Bouter L.M., Van Tulder M.W., Koes B.W., Methodologie issues in low back pain research in primary care, Spine, 23, pp. 2014-2020, (1998)
[10]  
Buttermann G.R., Garvey T.A., Hunt T.F., Et al., Lumbar fusion results related to diagnosis, Spine, 23, pp. 116-127, (1998)