The private–public literacy divide amid educational reform in Qatar: What does PISA tell us?

被引:8
作者
Cheema J.R. [1 ]
机构
[1] College of Education, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 314N EDUC MC-708, 1310 South Sixth Street, Champaign, 61820, IL
关键词
ANCOVA; Literacy gap; PISA; Private school; Public school; Qatar;
D O I
10.1007/s11159-015-9479-8
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The education system in Qatar comprises of both private schools, which receive money through student fees, and public schools, which are fully government-funded. In the mid-2000s, Qatar started its transition towards an independent school model with the aim of eventually converting all public schools into government-supported independent schools. The idea was to give public schools more autonomy in terms of hiring decisions, adoption of curriculum and textbooks, and budget spending, enabling them to emulate some of the private schools’ strategies for turning out successful students. This study examines evidence from the 2006–2012 administrations of the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) in Qatar in order to evaluate whether or not recent educational reform efforts in this country have succeeded in bridging the literacy divide between private and public schools. The results, presented in a number of detailed tables and discussed in the last part of the article, indicate that there is a significant difference in key literacy skills between the two types of schools. Private schools were found to outperform their public counterparts in areas such as mathematics, reading and science, both before and after controlling for important student-level differences, and this gap has evidently persisted from 2006 to 2012. © 2015, Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht and UNESCO Institute for Lifelong Learning.
引用
收藏
页码:173 / 189
页数:16
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
Belanger P., Literacy and lifelong learning, The Routledge international handbook of lifelong learning, pp. 80-90, (2009)
[2]  
Berrebi C., Martorell F., Tanner J., Qatar’s labor markets at a crucial crossroad, The Middle East Journal, 63, 3, pp. 421-442, (2009)
[3]  
Braun H., Jenkins F., Grigg W., Comparing private schools and public schools using hierarchical linear modeling (NCES 2006–461). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, (2006)
[4]  
Brewer D., Augustine C., Zellman G., Ryan G., Goldman C., Satsz C., Constant L., Education for a new era: Design and implementation of K–12 education reform in Qatar, (2007)
[5]  
Brown G., Micklewright J., Using international surveys of achievement and literacy: A view from the outside, (2004)
[6]  
Caldwell B., Is private schooling becoming the preferred model of school choice in Australia?, Journal of School Choice, 4, 4, pp. 378-397, (2010)
[7]  
Carbonaro W., Public–private differences in achievement among kindergarten students: Differences in learning opportunities and student outcomes, American Journal of Education, 113, 1, pp. 31-65, (2006)
[8]  
Cheema J., The migrant effect: An evaluation of native academic performance in Qatar, Research in Education, 91, pp. 65-77, (2014)
[9]  
Cohen J., Quantitative methods in Psychology: A power primer, Psychological Bulletin, 112, 1, pp. 155-159, (1992)
[10]  
Constant L., Goldman C.A., Zellman G.L., Augustine C.H., Galama T., Gonzalez G., Guarino C.A., Karam R., Ryan G.W., Salem H., Promoting quality and variety through the public financing of privately operated schools in Qatar, Journal of School Choice, 4, 4, pp. 450-473, (2010)