How does central enterprise reform promote total factor productivity of defense firms in China?

被引：0
作者：
Huaijia Zhu
Bo Chen
Huaiqi Zhu
机构：
[1] Central University of Finance and Economics,Institute of Defense Economics and Management
[2] University of Chinese Academy of Social Sciences,Department of Industrial Economy
来源：
Economic Change and Restructuring | 2024年 / 57卷
关键词：
Central enterprise reform; Total factor productivity; Stock incentive; Mergers and acquisitions; C33; D24;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Since 2017, the reform of central state-owned enterprises (SOEs) in China has had a profound impact on the operations and development of military-industrial enterprises. To study the influence of SOE reform on the total factor productivity (TFP) of China's state-owned military-industrial listed enterprises, this study uses a difference-in-differences model to conduct empirical tests. Its sample consists of relevant data from 115 military-industrial listed enterprises from 2011 to 2021. The results show that SOE reform has effectively improved the TFP of state-owned military-industrial listed enterprises. Furthermore, through heterogeneity testing, it was found that government subsidies weakened the impact of SOE reform on the TFP of military-industrial enterprises. Stock incentives had a greater impact on TFP than mergers and acquisitions. In similar conditions, motivating employees was more conducive to improving operational efficiency. The mechanism by which SOE reform affects the TFP of military-industrial enterprises is reflected in decreased agency costs and improving governance efficiency. The empirical results confirm the positive role of SOE reform and have certain enlightening significance for how to implement a scientific and reasonable subsidy system as well as how to design more effective reform measures.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 101 条
[1]  
Amit BC(2017)Can commercialization through partial disinvestment improve the performance of state-owned enterprises? The case of Indian SOEs under reforms J Gen Manag 43 5-14
[2]  
Arindam M(2017)Recasting the iron rice bowl: the reform of China's state-owned enterprises Rev Econ Stat 99 735-747
[3]  
Berkowitz D(2011)How are growth and productivity in private firms affected by public subsidy? Evidence from a regional policy Reg Sci Urban Econ 3 253-265
[4]  
Ma H(2004)The effect of the reform of Canadian state-owned enterprises on major corporate governance mechanisms Aust J Public Adm 63 79-94
[5]  
Nishioka S(2022)State-owned enterprises’ reforms and their implications for the resilience and vulnerability of the Chinese economy: evidence from the banking, energy and telecom sectors Netw Spat Econ 22 489-514
[6]  
Bernini C(2018)State, monopoly and bribery. Market reforms and corruption in a swedish state-owned entreprise Econ Sociol 11 64-79
[7]  
Pellegrini G(2018)Natural monopoly and mixed ownership reform-based on natural experiment and cost function analysis method China Econ 13 62-85
[8]  
Bozec R(2017)Do state and foreign ownership affect investment efficiency? Evidence from privatizations J Corp Finan 42 408-421
[9]  
Zéghal D(2018)Research of the impact of financial reform on total factor productivity-based on the empirical data of 5 national financial reform test areas Chin J Manag Sci 26 19-28
[10]  
Boujenoui A(2009)Do subsidies have positive impacts on R&D and innovation activities at the firm level Struct Chang Econ Dyn 20 239-253
12345678910